Re: Need review today: Please review Silver acknowledgements

If I remember correctly, Cybele did not want her name directly connected to
this work. Do we have a way to credit maybe by the IRC handle used instead
to thank without that connection?

-Shawn

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 5:53 PM Jeanne Spellman <
jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com> wrote:

> Add to D.1 Participants of the Silver Task Force and Community Group...
>
> Omar Bonilla
>
> Joe Cronin
>
> Mary Jo Mueller
>
> Sheri Byrne-Haber
>
> Lucy Greco
>
> Christy Owens
>
> Kimberly Patch
>
> Christian Perera
>
> Abi Roper
>
> Karen Schriver
>
> Stein Erik Skotkjerra
>
> David Swallow
>
> Suzanne Taylor
>
> Please keep the Research Partners as from D.3 of Requirements (it's what
> you have in the branch).
>
> On 10/27/2020 2:10 PM, Michael Cooper wrote:
> >
> > BTW, lists of participants that you might want to check for missing
> > names that you know of:
> >
> > Silver CG: https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/silver/participants
> >
> > Silver TF: https://www.w3.org/groups/tf/silver-tf
> >
> > AG WG: https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/ag/participants
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On 27/10/2020 1:59 p.m., Michael Cooper wrote:
> >>
> >> It turns out we (I) overlooked putting the acknowledgements section
> >> into the WCAG 3 draft. I've taken a stab:
> >>
> >>
> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/silver/acknowledgements/guidelines/index.html#acknowledgements
> >>
> >> I used my judgement about people who have contributed, but almost
> >> certainly missed people. Please let me know whom to add.
> >>
> >> I combined Silver CG and Silver TF because they operate as a unit.
> >> Normally I include company names alongside the individual, but things
> >> were all over the map and I couldn't get something consistent, so I
> >> just omitted that.
> >>
> >> I drew in part from an early draft:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/w3c/silver/blob/8809343c30a291bdac05d67a419fc65c0c785af3/edDraft/index.html
> >>
> >> From that, I also pulled in the "research partners" list. I didn't
> >> include the Design Sprint because I don't think that rises to the
> >> level of a spec acknowledgement - though perhaps those names should
> >> be credited as CG participants. I'm not sure either about the
> >> research partners, whether it rises to the level of belonging there,
> >> I'd like input on that.
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
>
>