- From: David Karger <karger@mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:33:01 -0400
- To: "Michael Lang(Jr.)" <michaelallenlang@gmail.com>
- CC: Paola Di Maio <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>, Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>, Tim rdf <timrdf@gmail.com>, Andreas Harth <andreas.harth@deri.org>, public-semweb-ui@w3.org
I would like to understand the requirements you are seeking to meet. If you just want to collect things, would a semantic mediawiki serve? For example, we have a collection of uses of SIMILE project tools being hosted in SMW: http://projects.csail.mit.edu/wibit/wiki/index.php?title=SimileResources . Michael Lang(Jr.) wrote: > Leo, > > Can you clarify what you mean by saying Twine is "closed"? I have > trouble understanding how people in this community use the terms > "open" and "closed" with respect to tools. > > Mike Lang > > Revelytix, Inc. > > phone: 410-584-0009 (office) > 443-928-3782 (cell) > skype: michael.allen.lang.jr > aim: MikeJrRevelytix > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Paola Di Maio > <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com <mailto:paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>> > wrote: > > Thanks for keeping up the discussion > > I agree that twine may not be 'open' and ideal, however basically > anyone can add things to twine, while the ESW I am not sure we can > all edit? (sorry if I am out of date on developments there). > > Also, does anyone else thinks that the GUI of the page below could > be improved and wonder if that tells something : > > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebUsability > > > Also, ideally, shouldnt we all be able to publish thing where we > favour, and then link them? > > do we need an ontology of semantic web usability expressed in RDF? > or something? > > I would like to link our workshop stuff papers, presentations etc) > from ASWC in Bangkok, too > > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Leo Sauermann > <leo.sauermann@dfki.de <mailto:leo.sauermann@dfki.de>> wrote: > > Hi, > > twine is closed, I would rather propose to use the ESW wiki by > W3C. > > I can't contribute nor coordinate this the next months, I just > moved to vienna > and need to get internet and other things.... > > best > Leo > > It was Tim rdf who said at the right time 27.06.2009 00:30 the > following words: >> Leo, >> >> I am very much interested in the objectives you outline and >> would like to contribute. I will follow the additions to the >> wiki. >> >> I created two Twines for Semantic Web Usability a while ago, >> but have not found anyone interested in the topic. Please >> feel free to tuck things there as well -- perhaps we could >> get some critical mass. Within a twine, we can comment on >> each artifact we post. >> >> http://www.twine.com/twine/116nk1j23-c11/semantic-web-user-interfaces >> >> http://www.twine.com/twine/116nlm5b5-c21/semantic-web-user-interaction >> >> Regards, >> Tim Lebo >> >> >> >> I like the idea of a collection of state-of-the-art, and >> will contribute, but only if I can edit myself and am >> sure that the state-of-the-art will be there the next >> years in public domain. >> The place where I am sure that it will remain open, and >> which is already the place where all other discussions >> about the Semantic Web happen, is the ESW wiki. >> I added a page here for you: >> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebUsability >> >> >> >> >> >> Rather, take exsiting tools and compare them against the >> vision - >> can your grandma find a doctor in her neighbourhood that >> will accept her Health Insurance and treat her illness? >> (This was the guiding example of "The Semantic Web", >> 2001, Timbl et al) >> so - can facetted browisng help? >> can xy help? >> >> etc. >> >> best >> Leo >> >> I would also humbly suggest to look at the usability >> concerns that are addressed in KDE 4.0, which has an RDF >> based metadata layer. >> In our NEPOMUK project we are currently working on the >> biggest deployment of Semantic Web technology (especially >> RDF) ever, reaching half of all linux users... much >> usability to study there. >> >> >> >> > > > -- > ____________________________________________________ > DI Leo Sauermann http://www.dfki.de/~sauermann <http://www.dfki.de/%7Esauermann> > > Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer > Kuenstliche Intelligenz DFKI GmbH > Trippstadter Strasse 122 > P.O. Box 2080 Fon: +49 631 20575-116 > D-67663 Kaiserslautern Fax: +49 631 20575-102 > Germany Mail: leo.sauermann@dfki.de <mailto:leo.sauermann@dfki.de> > > Geschaeftsfuehrung: > Prof.Dr.Dr.h.c.mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) > Dr. Walter Olthoff > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: > Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes > Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 > ____________________________________________________ > > > >
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2009 14:33:48 UTC