W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2014

RE: Propose an HL7 work group on RDF for Semantic Interoperability?

From: Michael Miller <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:24:19 -0700
Message-ID: <4dbcb5d6a4f44dcb53d0318f4b0babbe@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>
Cc: Anthony Mallia <amallia@edmondsci.com>, "Prud'hommeaux, Eric" <eric@w3.org>, Claude Nanjo <cnanjo@cognitivemedicine.com>, "Richards, Rafael M." <Rafael.Richards@va.gov>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
hi david and michel,

i agree with your initial effort, david, my experience with the HL7 is that
the charters for the WGs in HL7 are broad and short, but once the WG is
charted then a roadmap is the first order of business.  that's where
michel's suggestions would fit in

michael


Michael Miller
Software Engineer
Institute for Systems Biology


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Booth [mailto:david@dbooth.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 5:33 PM
> To: Michel Dumontier
> Cc: Anthony Mallia; Prud'hommeaux, Eric; Claude Nanjo; Richards, Rafael M.
> (Rafael.Richards@va.gov); w3c semweb HCLS
> Subject: Re: Propose an HL7 work group on RDF for Semantic
> Interoperability?
>
> Hi Michel,
>
> Thanks for your comments.  There definitely will need to be more
> specific deliverables identified at some point.  I guess I'm thinking of
> it initially as an umbrella under which various specific milestones and
> deliverables will be identified and pursued as the group prioritizes its
> work.  The intent of the draft is to explicitly call out the overall
> goal of using RDF to achieve semantic interoperability, under which many
> sub-goals would need to be pursued along the say.  The other HL7
> charters I read were all quite short -- one or two pages -- but maybe it
> would be good to include a bit more detail?
>
> David
>
>
> On 05/13/2014 04:58 PM, Michel Dumontier wrote:
> > David,
> >    I'm excited about the prospect, but I think the work group may be a
> > bit too broad without further refinement. I'd like to see a charter
> > articulated with a more specific focus, and identifying milestones that
> > deliver concrete outcomes (specifications, implementations, reports)
> > around targeted areas of urgent need.
> >   More importantly, I'd like to know what the uptake will be (e.g. who
> > will implement this), and how plans on using it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > m.
> >
> >
> > Michel Dumontier
> > Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford
> > University
> > Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest
> Group
> > http://dumontierlab.com
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:54 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org
> > <mailto:david@dbooth.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     I was at the HL7 meetings last week, and the idea arose of proposing
> >     an HL7 work group on RDF for Semantic Interoperability.  I took the
> >     initiative to draft a possible charter.  I meant to send it out
> >     earlier in case folks would like to discuss the idea on our 11:00am
> >     Eastern HCLS call today.  Attached is what I've drafted.  I'll join
> >     the call and see if anyone wants to discuss it.  Sorry for the late
> >     notice.
> >
> >     Zakim (W3C teleconference bridge).
> >     Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 <tel:%2B1.617.761.6200> (Cambridge, MA)
> >     VoIP address: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
> <mailto:sip%3Azakim@voip.w3.org>
> >     Participant Access Code: 4257 ("HCLS")
> >     IRC: irc.w3.org <http://irc.w3.org> port 6665 channel #HCLS
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     David
> >
> >
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2014 16:24:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:21:39 UTC