Re: asdf from Rafael Richards on 2013-07-11 (public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org from July 2013)

From: Rafael Richards <rafaelrichards@jhu.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:52:14 +0000
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: "<public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "Charlie Mead" <charlie.mead@yahoo.com>, Josh Mandel <jmandel@gmail.com>, "Hans Constandt" <hans@ontoforce.com>, Christel Daniel <christel.daniel@crc.jussieu.fr>, Sajjad Hussain <sajjad.hussain@crc.jussieu.fr>, Mustafa Yuksel <mustafa@srdc.com.tr>, "Gokce Banu Laleci Erturkmen" <gokce@srdc.com.tr>, Erick Von Schweber <erick@surveyorhealth.com>, "Solbrig, Harold R." <Solbrig.Harold@mayo.edu>, Stan Huff <Stan.Huff@imail.org>, "Jiang, Guoqian, M.D., Ph.D." <Jiang.Guoqian@mayo.edu>, "Emory Fry (Google Drive)" <eafry@gmx.com>, "Conor Dowling" <conor-dowling@caregraf.com>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Message-ID: <41E8FDF3-33D5-4AEF-9BD5-1B19A746AEB6@jhmi.edu>

Eric -

I would vote to focus on FHIR, as this is the model with the least amount of distracting, unnecessary legacy components of CDA.

Rafael


Rafael M. Richards, M.D., M.S.
Assistant Professor, Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine
Faculty, Division of Health Science Informatics
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Research Faculty, Veterans Health Administration
Baltimore, MD 2224   USA




On Jul 10, 2013, at 11:41 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org<mailto:eric@w3.org>> wrote:

Hi all, I'd like to have a Clinical Observations Interoperability call
on Friday at 11:00am US Eastern, 15:00Z. Proposed agenda:

 available data models
 FHIR/RDF
 migration between OpenEHR, FHIR, CCDA, etc.
 coordination with HL7 and CIMI

(Apologies to Guoqian who I understand can't make it this week.)
--
-ericP

Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 18:52:41 UTC