Re: triple store recommendation

Dear all,

Thank you for the great tips!

All the best,
Paul

--
Paul Rigor
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor



On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> In my experience, most concurrent triple stores perform fairly comparably
> well for queries. However, if you do plan to load a huge amount of RDF data
> into your triple, say more than 10 million, then I would suggest you get a
> powerful computer first.
>
> A 64-bit computer with >15GB memory should give you some reasonable
> performance. And you can also play with some disk partition.
>
> I wrote some notes a while back, benchmarked on Jena TDB:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/open-biomed/wiki/BenchmarkLoadingFlyBaseEC2XLarge
>
> Hope it can be helpful to you.
>
> cheers,
>
> Jun
>
>
> On 14/06/11 16:05, M. Scott Marshall wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> There was a paper comparing query performance presented at SWAT4LS in
>> Berlin 2010 by Vladimir Mironov (CC'd).
>>
>> Within HCLS, many triplestores have been used. It depends on the purpose
>> and your preferences for features. The HCLS KB is in Virtuoso and
>> Allegrograph. We've also worked with Sesame and OWLIM. NCBO uses Mulgara
>> for their SPARQL endpoint. The nice thing about many of the triplestores
>> is that if you decide to use another one, migrating your data isn't much
>> work so you're not locked in.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Scott
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Michael Miller
>> <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org
>> <mailto:Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>> wrote:
>>
>>    hi paul,
>>
>>    i did a little research on this a little while ago.  you should have
>>    plenty of power.
>>
>>    if you're research i hear oracle offers their spatial triple store
>>    for free, running jena on top of a storage system like BigOWLIMis
>>    also quite popular
>>
>>    check out Berlin SPARQL benchmark
>>    (
>> http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/results/V5/index.html
>> )
>>
>>    cheers,
>>
>>    michael
>>
>>    *From:*public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
>>    <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
>>    [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
>>    <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>] *On Behalf Of *Paul
>> Rigor
>>    *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:03 AM
>>    *To:* public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org <mailto:
>> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
>>
>>    *Subject:* triple store recommendation
>>
>>    Hi all,
>>
>>    It was fun joining the conference call yesterday; very enlightening.
>>
>>    I'm looking into setting up my own triplestore (for the first
>>    time!). I was wondering if you'd have recommendations on which
>>    storage backend I could use. I'll be deploying the triplestore on an
>>    okay machine (quad intel xeon X5570 with 48GB, 400GB on striped SAS
>>    disks).
>>
>>    Thanks,
>>    Paul
>>
>>    --
>>
>>    Paul Rigor
>>
>>    http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor <http://www.ics.uci.edu/%7Eprigor>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> M. Scott Marshall, W3C HCLS IG co-chair, http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls
>> http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall
>>
>>
>
>