- From: Helena Deus <helenadeus@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:08:04 +0100
- To: Paul Rigor <paul.rigor@uci.edu>
- Cc: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <E7D9C12A-C55A-462C-B17F-E4A88D81A46C@gmail.com>
Hi Paul, I am using owlim on top of sesame, which is great if you are Planning to use inference in the sparql query. Sent from my phone On 14 Jun 2011, at 17:54, Paul Rigor <paul.rigor@uci.edu> wrote: > Dear all, > > Thank you for the great tips! > > All the best, > Paul > > -- > Paul Rigor > http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > In my experience, most concurrent triple stores perform fairly comparably well for queries. However, if you do plan to load a huge amount of RDF data into your triple, say more than 10 million, then I would suggest you get a powerful computer first. > > A 64-bit computer with >15GB memory should give you some reasonable performance. And you can also play with some disk partition. > > I wrote some notes a while back, benchmarked on Jena TDB: > > http://code.google.com/p/open-biomed/wiki/BenchmarkLoadingFlyBaseEC2XLarge > > Hope it can be helpful to you. > > cheers, > > Jun > > > On 14/06/11 16:05, M. Scott Marshall wrote: > Hi Paul, > > There was a paper comparing query performance presented at SWAT4LS in > Berlin 2010 by Vladimir Mironov (CC'd). > > Within HCLS, many triplestores have been used. It depends on the purpose > and your preferences for features. The HCLS KB is in Virtuoso and > Allegrograph. We've also worked with Sesame and OWLIM. NCBO uses Mulgara > for their SPARQL endpoint. The nice thing about many of the triplestores > is that if you decide to use another one, migrating your data isn't much > work so you're not locked in. > > Cheers, > Scott > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Michael Miller > <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org > <mailto:Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>> wrote: > > hi paul, > > i did a little research on this a little while ago. you should have > plenty of power. > > if you're research i hear oracle offers their spatial triple store > for free, running jena on top of a storage system like BigOWLIMis > also quite popular > > check out Berlin SPARQL benchmark > (http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/results/V5/index.html) > > cheers, > > michael > > *From:*public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org > <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> > [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org > <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>] *On Behalf Of *Paul Rigor > *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:03 AM > *To:* public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > > *Subject:* triple store recommendation > > Hi all, > > It was fun joining the conference call yesterday; very enlightening. > > I'm looking into setting up my own triplestore (for the first > time!). I was wondering if you'd have recommendations on which > storage backend I could use. I'll be deploying the triplestore on an > okay machine (quad intel xeon X5570 with 48GB, 400GB on striped SAS > disks). > > Thanks, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Rigor > > http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor <http://www.ics.uci.edu/%7Eprigor> > > > > > -- > > M. Scott Marshall, W3C HCLS IG co-chair, http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls > http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 17:09:44 UTC