- From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:20:54 +0100
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Hi Paul, In my experience, most concurrent triple stores perform fairly comparably well for queries. However, if you do plan to load a huge amount of RDF data into your triple, say more than 10 million, then I would suggest you get a powerful computer first. A 64-bit computer with >15GB memory should give you some reasonable performance. And you can also play with some disk partition. I wrote some notes a while back, benchmarked on Jena TDB: http://code.google.com/p/open-biomed/wiki/BenchmarkLoadingFlyBaseEC2XLarge Hope it can be helpful to you. cheers, Jun On 14/06/11 16:05, M. Scott Marshall wrote: > Hi Paul, > > There was a paper comparing query performance presented at SWAT4LS in > Berlin 2010 by Vladimir Mironov (CC'd). > > Within HCLS, many triplestores have been used. It depends on the purpose > and your preferences for features. The HCLS KB is in Virtuoso and > Allegrograph. We've also worked with Sesame and OWLIM. NCBO uses Mulgara > for their SPARQL endpoint. The nice thing about many of the triplestores > is that if you decide to use another one, migrating your data isn't much > work so you're not locked in. > > Cheers, > Scott > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Michael Miller > <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org > <mailto:Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>> wrote: > > hi paul, > > i did a little research on this a little while ago. you should have > plenty of power. > > if you're research i hear oracle offers their spatial triple store > for free, running jena on top of a storage system like BigOWLIMis > also quite popular > > check out Berlin SPARQL benchmark > (http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/results/V5/index.html) > > cheers, > > michael > > *From:*public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org > <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org> > [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org > <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>] *On Behalf Of *Paul Rigor > *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:03 AM > *To:* public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > *Subject:* triple store recommendation > > Hi all, > > It was fun joining the conference call yesterday; very enlightening. > > I'm looking into setting up my own triplestore (for the first > time!). I was wondering if you'd have recommendations on which > storage backend I could use. I'll be deploying the triplestore on an > okay machine (quad intel xeon X5570 with 48GB, 400GB on striped SAS > disks). > > Thanks, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Rigor > > http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor <http://www.ics.uci.edu/%7Eprigor> > > > > > -- > M. Scott Marshall, W3C HCLS IG co-chair, http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls > http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall >
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 15:21:42 UTC