- From: François Scharffe <francois.scharffe@inria.fr>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:44:31 +0200
- To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Hi, I've recently played around with BioRDF and LODD datasets. I must say I'm impressed by the number of datasets available. It's good to see how the linked data can lead to interesting queries allowing to discover new information. I particularly like the TCM examples [1]. I have a concern regarding the vocabularies used to published datasets. On one side it seems there are plenty of biomedical ontologies like the ones on the bioportal, but on the other side there are many datasets that each use its own native schema without referring to these ontologies. Is there for example a reason why 'drugs' concepts in Dailymed and Drugbank are different ? Why not reusing an existing ontology describing drugs ? Is there actually a set of datasets reusing the same ontology/ies ? I'm actually working on ontology alignment so I'd be glad to help in the aligning task. I must however admit that I'm not very knowledgeable in the biomediacal domain. Cheers, François [1] http://code.google.com/p/junsbriefcase/wiki/RDFTCMData
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:43:48 UTC