- From: Maryann Martone <maryann@ncmir.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:25:55 -0700
- To: Helen Parkinson <parkinso@ebi.ac.uk>
- Cc: Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>, Nigam Shah <nigam@stanford.edu>, HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, tomasz.adamusiak@gmail.com, Fahim Imam <smtifahim@gmail.com>
It is there. I know that Fahim uploaded the latest; I don't know if it's exposed yet. The BIoportal has had some troubles with the modular design, but I think most have been worked out On Sep 1, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Helen Parkinson wrote: > Having the NIFSTD in bioportal would be ideal, we will always defer > to NIF for neuroscience terms, > > best > > Helen > > Kei Cheung wrote: >> Nigam Shah wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Helen Parkinson >>> <parkinson@ebi.ac.uk <mailto:parkinson@ebi.ac.uk>> wrote: >>> >>> The performance depends largely on how well the ontology is >>> aligned with the input data, for this reason we developed our own >>> ontology. >>> >>> This is very true. However, if there is already an existing >>> ontology that matches the input data well (e.g. the NCI Thesaurus >>> in case of Tissue Microarray Annotations in TMAD (http://tma.stanford.edu/ >>> ) .. then its possible to use the annotator tool at NCBO (http://bioportal.bioontology.org/annotate >>> ). >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nigam. >> I notice that EFO is accessible through BioPortal. As the Neurolex >> group is in the process of updating NIFSTD, perhaps the new version >> of NIFSTD may also be made accessible through BioPortal when it's >> ready. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Kei >> > Maryann Martone Professor-In-Residence Dept of Neurosciences University of California, San Diego San Diego, CA 92093-0446 Tel: 858 822 0745 Fax: 858 246 0644
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 19:26:31 UTC