- From: Michael Hucka <mhucka@caltech.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 19:23:47 -0700
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Hi Oliver, Thanks for your reply. curoli> You just have to allow some time for people here curoli> to get familiar with SBML, and to navigate the curoli> buerocracy. OK. What would be the best way to help that along? curoli> Systems Biology is a central theme in the HCLSIG, curoli> although it is not very clear where it fits into curoli> the current organization: HCLSIG has six task curoli> forces, of which at least about half have a strong curoli> connection to Systems Biology, although none of curoli> them really focusses on it. In the context of HCLSIG's charter, it might be interesting to bring up the fact that SBML tries to be very supportive of annotations and semantic web technologies. (I know Oliver is aware of the following, but for other people:) For example, there is an explicit scheme in SBML for annotating elements of a computational model with references to (external) ontologies. SBML specifies that these annotations should be done using some basic RDF syntax. There even exists a cool system, MIRIAM Resources (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/miriam/), to help software systems create links from model elements to (external) resources. Does this semantic webishness help bring SBML closer to HCLSIG? Thanks, MH
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 02:24:22 UTC