Re: Less strong equivalences (was Re: blog: semantic dissonance in uniprot)

Dan Brickley wrote:
> On 25/3/09 21:05, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>> Oh, another possibility, 4) probabilistic sameAs. That's probably more
>> researchy than similarity logics, but more in the next few year timeline
>> rather than in the "have no idea" timeline.
>
> I lean towards this one. Something with a stronger hint at possible 
> identity than rdfs:seeAlso but without brazenly asserting it's the 
> selfsame thing.
>
> Dan
>
>
Dan,

Remember, this is addressed at: http://umbel.org :-)

-- 


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com

Received on Wednesday, 25 March 2009 22:23:53 UTC