- From: Donald Doherty <donald.doherty@brainstage.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 20:38:12 -0400
- To: <samwald@gmx.at>, <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Matthias, I can really appreciate the value in this right now. Thank you for the heads-up! Don -----Original Message----- From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of samwald@gmx.at Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 8:20 PM To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: [hcls] The Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group I want to bring an initiative to your attention that should be of interest to many of the participants of the HCLS: The "Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group". As I have already summarized on a ESW Wiki page [1], we are currently lacking a common way for representing bibliographic information, and this is a highly undesirable state -- references to publications and authorship information are fundamental to scientific discourse. The newly founded Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group has the goal of creating a unified ontology that would solve this problem. There is very generic website [2] and a Google Group [3] available at the moment. I think a cooperation of some interested members of the HCLSIG and this initiative could be of benefit to all involved parties. -- Matthias Samwald [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_BibliographicInformation [2] http://bibliontology.com/ [3] http://groups.google.com/group/bibliographic-ontology-specification-group . -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 00:31:32 UTC