Re: bams class style model

I reasoned as follows:

If a part should be a class, then a different name for that part should be an 
equivalentClass. Likewise, if something were an individual, then sameAs should 
be used.

I'll be happy to use whatever representation people think works best for the 
demo.

jb


Quoting William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>:

> Sorry I was unable to attend today's meeting.
> 
> Alan reminds me of another question I had re: this BAMS OWL file, John.
> 
> I understand why you'd not want to tuck the ID and abbreviation  
> values into annotation properties.  Is there a reason not to add them  
> as DatatypeProperties?  This would help to make the core subsumptive  
> 'is_a' graph more meaningful but still keep these values accessible  
> to both reasoners and to a SPARQL engine - correct?
> 
> Cheers,
> Bill
> 
> On Mar 19, 2007, at 10:15 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Great progress!
> >
> > I think I would choose a single name and then have e.g,  id and  
> > abbreviation be properties of it. You can use annotation properties  
> > for these. Then remove the "by" layer of the ontology - these lists  
> > can be regenerate on demand via e.g. a sparql query.
> >
> > I notice that you use has_part and part_of in the definitions.  
> > Remember that each is a all-some statement, so perhaps verify that  
> > that is true. e.g. a has_part some b = every a has some b as a  
> > part. a part_of some b = every a is part of some b. Sometimes only  
> > one or the other direction is true.
> >
> > Speak to you soon,
> >
> > Best,
> > Alan
> >
> >
> > On Mar 19, 2007, at 8:18 AM, John Barkley wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> For another one of my action items, I put on the wiki demo page:
> >> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_DemoHomePage_HCLSIG_Demo
> >> a reference to the initial bams class style model and an updated  
> >> bams instance
> >> style model. In both, I made the properties "has_source" and  
> >> "has_target"
> >> transitive. Please let me know if this is not correct.
> >>
> >> There are no instances in the class style model. It is in the  
> >> style of the
> >> Pizza tutorial
> >> (http://www.co-ode.org/resources/tutorials/ProtegeOWLTutorial.pdf).
> >> You may notice that the model is OWL Full, but that's only because  
> >> there is an
> >> annotation property "has_bams_URL". Reasoners generally ignore  
> >> annotation
> >> properties.
> >>
> >> jb
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> Bill Bug
> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer
> 
> Laboratory for Bioimaging  & Anatomical Informatics
> www.neuroterrain.org
> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy
> Drexel University College of Medicine
> 2900 Queen Lane
> Philadelphia, PA    19129
> 215 991 8430 (ph)
> 610 457 0443 (mobile)
> 215 843 9367 (fax)
> 
> 
> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 19:44:15 UTC