Re: URL +1, LSID -1

Matthias Samwald wrote:
> I would actually prefer the "commons/source/id.type" pattern, if it can 
> be implemented with the current system. It is more intuitive to 
> most developers/users and it brings the elements of the URI into a nice 
> hierarchical order.

id.type certainly seems like a good idea for the actual URL of a specific 
representation, as anything else doesn't "Save as..." well (except perhaps 
web pages, where browsers are smart enough to propose the .html extension).

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 07:16:24 UTC