- From: William Bug <William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:37:10 -0500
- To: Carole Goble <carole.goble@manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Davide Zaccagnini <davide@landcglobal.com>, Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, David Decraene <David@landcglobal.com>, Phillip Lord <phillip.lord@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Message-Id: <F3244C6E-75CB-4940-8A18-45E317BA2FE6@DrexelMed.edu>
Thanks, Carole. Which reminds me - there were two additional references I'd add to the bottom of the page: The Motagues and the Capulets Carole Goble and Chris Wroe http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/109925284/ ABSTRACT?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0 The recent Upper Ontology Summit (March 2006) http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit/ UosJointCommunique though unfortunately many of us lowly ontology users are still waiting for some of the announced deliverables. ;-) Cheers, Bill On Jan 24, 2007, at 10:23 AM, Carole Goble wrote: > Bill > > Hear hear!! Well said. > > Carole > >> I was thinking initially Phil's concerns may have been more in >> terms of the wording used on the page, but Robert makes it more >> clear the issues are much more fundamental than that. All of >> Robert's points sound very much to the root of why there would be >> concerns this is not a comprehensive view of what "formal" can >> mean in both the construction and use of ontologies. >> >> I did like the fact an attempt was made to include the cornucopia >> of Upper Level ontologies in active use, since clarity on this >> issue has often not been very good - and the arguments that rage >> over which best fits a particular application can be difficult to >> follow for some. >> >> I would certainly want to commend David Z's colleague for having >> the bravery (others might call it temerity) to step out and make a >> first stab at presenting - in a very public forum - a topic that >> can often foment arguments during academic debates. I've been >> party to many public debates over specific scientific issues over >> the years, but there is something about the topic of proper >> ontology construction and implementation in biomedical informatics >> - debates that must address what an ontology IS and what an >> ontology IS NOT - that brings out the most vehement >> disagreements. The disagreements will remain, so long as there >> are effective applications to demonstrate the value of the >> differing points-of-view. >> >> Perhaps we could work to assist David D. in his noble effort to >> disseminate information on this topic of great importance to many >> of us in this very public forum, if others agree its useful to >> have such a resource in the Wikipedia. >> >> Cheers, >> Bill >> >> >> On Jan 24, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Davide Zaccagnini wrote: >> >>> David Decreane from L&C started that page and wrote good part of >>> the content. I'm passing him your kind comments. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Davide >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb- >>> lifesci-request@w3.org> on behalf of William Bug >>> Sent: Tue 1/23/2007 4:06 PM >>> To: Alan Ruttenberg >>> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls >>> Subject: Re: [biont] Nice wikipedia page on ontology >>> >>> Great reference, Alan! >>> >>> I'd noticed a while back, a collection of folks who understand >>> the formal details, the entirety of the landscape, and >>> collectively have done a great job documenting this info have >>> worked on that page. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Bill >>> >>> >>> On Jan 23, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Start at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_Ontology >>> >>> -Alan >>> >>> >>> >>> Bill Bug >>> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer >>> >>> Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics >>> www.neuroterrain.org >>> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy >>> Drexel University College of Medicine >>> 2900 Queen Lane >>> Philadelphia, PA 19129 >>> 215 991 8430 (ph) >>> 610 457 0443 (mobile) >>> 215 843 9367 (fax) >>> >>> >>> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu >>> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Bill Bug >> Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer >> >> Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics >> www.neuroterrain.org >> Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy >> Drexel University College of Medicine >> 2900 Queen Lane >> Philadelphia, PA 19129 >> 215 991 8430 (ph) >> 610 457 0443 (mobile) >> 215 843 9367 (fax) >> >> >> Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu >> <mailto:William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu> >> >> >> >> > Bill Bug Senior Research Analyst/Ontological Engineer Laboratory for Bioimaging & Anatomical Informatics www.neuroterrain.org Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy Drexel University College of Medicine 2900 Queen Lane Philadelphia, PA 19129 215 991 8430 (ph) 610 457 0443 (mobile) 215 843 9367 (fax) Please Note: I now have a new email - William.Bug@DrexelMed.edu
Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:37:27 UTC