W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Does follow-your-nose apply in the enterprise? was: RDF for molecules, using InChI

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:50:43 -0400
Message-Id: <FAEF8255-97A9-4E41-9D60-1A0369DA1FB7@creativecommons.org>
Cc: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Eric Jain" <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, ogbujic@ccf.org, "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
To: Eric Neumann <eneumann@teranode.com>
Sure - to list alternatives with costs and benefits is just what I've  
proposed to do in order to civilize these debates, and as a waypoint  
toward drafting the fabled 'recommendations' report. I'm sorry I've  
been inactive on the list but other matters have been pressing. I  
have been trying to keep up and have not forgotten about the project.  
I'll plan to report at the BioRDF call on Sept 17, if not sooner. But  
you don't need to wait for me; I welcome additions to the  
recommendations area of the wiki, starting at http://esw.w3.org/topic/ 
HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices/Recommendations .  
E.g. David Booth should feel free to link his declarations memo  
(which echoes some of my own angst) from the 'reference' list or this  
'analysis and ideas' list.


On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Eric Neumann wrote:

> Jonathan,
> I would like to follow up with Bijan suggestion and try to phrase  
> some of the 'disputes and considerations' in terms of problem  
> statement and pro-con solutions. Can you help organize this and  
> make sure it gets added to the URI Best Practices web site?
> thanks,
> Eric
> ----- On 21 Aug 2007, Bijan Parsia wrote: -----
> ...[snip]
> Anyhoo. This seems neither here nor there. Perhaps it's worth
> phrasing some of these disputes in a problem statement then pro-con
> various solutions way? I have three possible problems with minting or
> using terms list above, perhaps we could start with one of those and
> try to capture all the considerations? We could do this on the wiki
> or in email. It might be more productive than an inherently
> argumentative exchange.
> Cheers,
> Bijan.

Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2007 22:55:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:29 UTC