W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > August 2007

RE: Does follow-your-nose apply in the enterprise? was: RDF for molecules, using InChI

From: Eric Neumann <eneumann@teranode.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:58:47 -0400
Message-ID: <E7092F10DB73FA43AE0E59F2DCDAA6360A91F4@MI8NYCMAIL04.Mi8.com>
To: "Jonathan Reese" <jar@creativecommons.org>
cc: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Eric Jain" <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, ogbujic@ccf.org, "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>


I would like to follow up with Bijan suggestion and try to phrase some of the 'disputes and considerations' in terms of problem statement and pro-con solutions. Can you help organize this and make sure it gets added to the URI Best Practices web site?


----- On 21 Aug 2007, Bijan Parsia wrote: -----


Anyhoo. This seems neither here nor there. Perhaps it's worth  
phrasing some of these disputes in a problem statement then pro-con  
various solutions way? I have three possible problems with minting or  
using terms list above, perhaps we could start with one of those and  
try to capture all the considerations? We could do this on the wiki  
or in email. It might be more productive than an inherently  
argumentative exchange.

Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 16:00:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:20:29 UTC