- From: Andreas Harth <andreas.harth@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:28:04 +0100
- To: Eric Neumann <eneumann@teranode.com>
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Hi Eric, you might find [1] interesting in relation to the one thing/multiple URI problem you're mentioning. We distinguish four approaches to chosing a URI over multiple alternatives in a Web data aggregation scenario: - random or lexical ordering - most agreed upon across data sources - count of occurrence - links analysis Regards, Andreas. [1] http://sw.deri.org/2007/02/objcon/paper.pdf Eric Neumann wrote: > > A recent paper has been published that addresses some of the same URI > issues we've been discussing: > > "URI Identity Management for Semantic Web Data Integration and Linkage" > http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14361/ > > They focus on Coreference aka Record Linkages, which deals with the > problem of having more than one URI for the "same thing". There's a > probabilistic theory behind it, but it offers an approach different > from using "owl:sameAs' between possible similar things. > > My take-- coming from a life sciences perspective-- is that we still > need to standardize URI's to specific datarecords (e.g., uniprot, > entrez, ensemble, etc) as well as concepts, but when we need to > "cross-bundle" different records that are supposedly referring to the > same bio-entity (uniprot/p12345 ~ entrez/g6422 ~ ensmeble/s47721), > then this approach may be worth considering. > > I leave it to the group to discuss the possible value of this paper to > our ongoing URI activity... > > Eric >
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 18:29:09 UTC