- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 23:12:34 -0400
- To: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>
- Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
I have proposed something related to this for OBI, for capturing the sources of definitions. A description can be found at http://esw.w3.org/topic/OBI_Definition_Source. I added a link to your page. Comments/questions welcome, -Alan On Apr 6, 2007, at 12:55 PM, samwald@gmx.at wrote: > > > Many of the Semantic Web ontologies in the domain of HCLS contain > constructs for the representation of bibliographic information and > references to database entries. Unfortunately, it seems that most > of them came up with their own solutions. > If we as Semantic Web developers want to be taken seriously in our > striving for improved interoperability, we should try to find a > common solution. Of course, we can do mappings between our > ontologies, but it would definitly be preferable to use the same > set of constructs from the start. As most of our ontologies are > under development, we still have the opportunity to reach an > agreement. > > I have started a wiki page that lists HCLS ontologies that contain > constructs for the representation of bibliographic information, as > well as possible standards that could be re-used to increase > interoperability: > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_BibliographicInformation > > I am sure that the list is incomplete, so please take the time to > add to it. What are your thoughts about this problem? > > > cheers, > Matthias Samwald > > > > > > > . > -- > "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ... > Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail >
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2007 03:13:19 UTC