RE: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies.

Kei,

I would say yes, it is of interest. However, I was hoping that some of us
could pitch in to extend your work without giving you yet another thing to
do :^).

Don

-----Original Message-----
From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of kei cheung
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 3:38 PM
To: donald.doherty@brainstage.com
Cc: 'Alan Ruttenberg'; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; 'Alan Rector'; 'Robert
Stevens'; 'Matthias Samwald'
Subject: Re: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies.


Hi Don and Alan,

In addition to neuronal information, BrainPharm, which is a subdatabase 
of SenseLab, stores some drug-related information about the Parkinson's 
Disease (http://senselab.med.yale.edu/BrainPharm/dopamine.asp) if it is 
also of interest to the group.

-Kei

Donald Doherty wrote:

>Alan,
>
>It seems that NeurWeb provides a great platform for us (the BIONT team) to
>experiment with. Some of the specific mappings you suggested for the
>Parkinson's disease use case should work.
>
>Perhaps we can come up with a bridge ontology to try linking NeuroWeb with
>an atlas such as http://brainmaps.org and one or more of the sites with
>details on antibodies, genes, and...?
>
>Don
>
>-----
>Donald Doherty, Ph.D.
>Brainstage Research, Inc.
>www.brainstage.com
>donald.doherty@brainstage.com
>412-478-4552
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
>[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Ruttenberg
>Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 6:46 PM
>To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
>Cc: Alan Rector; Robert Stevens; Matthias Samwald
>Subject: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies.
>
>
>Kei Chung has updated the Senselab BioRDF here.
>
>http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/SenseLab
>
>In it he points to the NeuroWeb web site
>
>http://128.36.123.50/NeuroWeb/
>
>Which contains links to OWL ontologies for cocodat and neurondb (plus  
>a sampling of data).
>
>Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For  
>instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf  
>class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with  
>these values. What do people think of this?
>
>I don't think we have a TC planned for this coming tuesday, but if  
>there is sufficient interest we can set one up. Otherwise we can talk  
>about it the following week.
>
>-Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>

Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2006 21:29:26 UTC