- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 12:54:29 -0400
- To: "John Barkley" <jbarkley@nist.gov>
- Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Hi John, Thanks, I had read that before but had forgot that this was specifically mentioned in that document. I'm still trying to understand the full implications. In particular, I think that OWL 1.1 may remove the restriction that motivated this pattern, but that there may be problems - Just wrote this note to the OWL list, we'll see what folks say: http://lists.mindswap.org/pipermail/owl/2006-May/000310.html The OWL 1.1 web site is http://owl1_1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/ -Alan On May 22, 2006, at 11:37 AM, John Barkley wrote: > > alan, > >> Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For >> instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf >> class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with >> these values. What do people think of this? > > This is an often used technique to keep ontologies/knowledge bases OWL > DL. > There is a very nice article on this subject at: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-classes-as-values > > jb > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> > To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> > Cc: "Alan Rector" <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>; "Robert Stevens" > <robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk>; "Matthias Samwald" <samwald@gmx.at> > Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 6:46 PM > Subject: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies. > > >> >> Kei Chung has updated the Senselab BioRDF here. >> >> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/SenseLab >> >> In it he points to the NeuroWeb web site >> >> http://128.36.123.50/NeuroWeb/ >> >> Which contains links to OWL ontologies for cocodat and neurondb (plus >> a sampling of data). >> >> Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For >> instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf >> class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with >> these values. What do people think of this? >> >> I don't think we have a TC planned for this coming tuesday, but if >> there is sufficient interest we can set one up. Otherwise we can talk >> about it the following week. >> >> -Alan >> >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 22 May 2006 16:54:35 UTC