- From: John Barkley <jbarkley@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 11:37:34 -0400
- To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
alan, > Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For > instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf > class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with > these values. What do people think of this? This is an often used technique to keep ontologies/knowledge bases OWL DL. There is a very nice article on this subject at: http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-classes-as-values jb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> To: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org> Cc: "Alan Rector" <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>; "Robert Stevens" <robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk>; "Matthias Samwald" <samwald@gmx.at> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 6:46 PM Subject: [BIONT] Senselab project ontologies. > > Kei Chung has updated the Senselab BioRDF here. > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/SenseLab > > In it he points to the NeuroWeb web site > > http://128.36.123.50/NeuroWeb/ > > Which contains links to OWL ontologies for cocodat and neurondb (plus > a sampling of data). > > Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For > instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf > class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with > these values. What do people think of this? > > I don't think we have a TC planned for this coming tuesday, but if > there is sufficient interest we can set one up. Otherwise we can talk > about it the following week. > > -Alan > > >
Received on Monday, 22 May 2006 15:39:09 UTC