- From: Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:23:59 -0500
- To: "'public-semweb-lifesci'" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Michael, > http://www.omg.org/docs/ad/05-09-08.pdf > > Because it is still being evaluated, this might only be > available from the OMG website to OMG members. Thanks. I was able to get the document. Though haven't read through yet, it is too long ( closed to 300 pages ) but I spotted one heading from the document: 8.2 Why Not Simply Use or Extend the UML 2.0 Metamodel? To me, it implies that RDF != UML 4.0? Xiaoshu
Received on Wednesday, 1 March 2006 19:24:19 UTC