- From: Marco Brandizi <brandizi@ebi.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:25:38 +0100
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Miller, Michael D (Rosetta) wrote: > One other issue is that the actual objects in a microarray experiment > are for the most part one offs--i.e. a chip is a chip, it is only > hybridized once, the current investigation is only performed once > with a set of chips and so on. Even the genes that are being > investigated, nothing new is being added to them except the > interpretation of the data from the investigation. > Hi Micheal, I am not sure I got it: attaching the interpretation of data should be valuable, as well as finding a good way to model such interpretation. Moreover, a single chip is is related, for instance to an array design or an extraction protocol, you could talk about an array design, for instance in which studies it has been most used, or the conditions under wich the protocol performs best. Cheers. -- =============================================================================== Marco Brandizi <brandizi@ebi.ac.uk> http://gca.btbs.unimib.it/brandizi
Received on Sunday, 11 June 2006 22:48:48 UTC