- From: Eric Jain <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:51:51 +0200
- To: Gary Bader <bader@cbio.mskcc.org>
- CC: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Gary Bader wrote: > Ok - thanks. Also, it seems that there are two namespace models, one > for RDF IDs, used in OWL documents and one for LSIDs. I guess that is > not major but is part of the 'life-science aware' issue you mentioned. I guess you could say there are two kinds of identifiers: Identifiers that are URLs, and identifiers that aren't :-) But as Sean Martin pointed out, an RDF resource can be identified by any kind of URI, so there is nothing un-RDFish about URNs such as LSIDs.
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 14:52:01 UTC