Re: CfC: publish First Public Working Draft of the Presentation API (deadline 12 Feb)

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Kostiainen, Anssi <
anssi.kostiainen@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi MarkW,
>
> > On 05 Feb 2015, at 02:09, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> wrote:
> >
> > I support Mark (Foltz)s comments. The FPWD should flag the open issues
> that must be solved to meet the scope of the charter, to encourage feedback
> on the whole of the problem space we are addressing.
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> Does the updated Status of This Document section address your concerns
> with regard to "flagging the open issues"?
>

​Yes, the updated document with the issues explicitly referenced looks good
to me.

…Mark​



>
> Please feel free to help MarkFo, Dominik and other participants to review
> the open issues in GH [1] as well as the open issues annotated in the spec
> (search with "open issue:" [2]) to ensure they reflect the scope of the
> charter to the best understanding of the group as of now.
>
> Please note that commenting GH issues is now very easy and convenient,
> since the comments made in GH issues are automatically reflected back to
> this mailing list to keep the whole group informed. If you have comments on
> specific open issues in GH, I recommend you add your comment to GH issues
> directly.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Anssi
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/presentation-api/issues
> [2] http://w3c.github.io/presentation-api/