Re: Agenda for virtual meeting 4th March

Responses on our charter review.

https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues/252

I do want to see us including accessibility at ontological and best
practices level in SDW work. Unsure if we have the right expertise in
W3C APA on spatial and in OGC on accessibility but worth seeing what we
can do. 

Perhaps this topic (Spatial Accessibility) is worth adding to agenda.

On Tue, 2021-03-02 at 08:45 -0500, Ted Guild wrote:
> Hopefully charter completes the last of horizontal reviews and goes
> to management tomorrow. If that is the case, I can share on call that
> it is next going to W3C membership for approval. There is an
> accessibility group in W3C we should reach out to in order to get
> their input on incorporating accessibility data for locations, routes
> etc. The suggestion to collaborate with them came out of horizontal
> review. That would likely be at most a brief topic for Thursday.
> 
> -- 
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> W3C Automotive Lead 
> http://www.w3.org
> 
> > On Mar 2, 2021, at 8:17 AM, Linda van den Brink <
> > l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Jeremy, Ted, Clara,
> >  
> > Are there any topics you’d like to discuss at the upcoming SDWIG
> > meeting (this Thursday)?
> >  
> > @Clara Boyd are you available to discuss the pull request Andrea
> > prepared with his proposed update of the SDWBP related to DCAT 2.0?
> >  
> > Jeremy, Ted, anything else, maybe in relation to the charter
> > renewal?
> >  
> > I’m also happy to hear from others in the group about other topics
> > we might discuss. It’s a bit late already (2 days in advance of the
> > meeting) but if there’s nothing for the agenda at the moment, we
> > might skip this one and plan a meeting at the next OGC meeting
> > instead (week of 22 March).
> >  
> > Linda
-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead
https://www.w3.org/auto