- From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 10:04:08 -0500
- To: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
- Cc: public-sdwig <public-sdwig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <ca793ebe17500f8c66ebf14324324da1e7d1b49c.camel@w3.org>
Ed, It was recommended we do something geospatial specific for the shortname as responsible-use could apply to any one of a number of areas. spatial-data-use was suggested but open to alternatives. On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 09:56 -0500, Ted Guild wrote: > We're in luck, FPWD for a Note doesn't require call for consensus and > moratorium goes from 23 December through 5 January. I'll prepare the > document for 22 December and follow up with Ed if there are any more > substantive tweaks that I shouldn't resolve without his input. > > On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 09:43 -0500, Ted Guild wrote: > > We typically keep publications with advance notice to > > Tuesdays/Thursdays except for those that can be automated, which > > doesn't include a FPWD. We might be starting a publishing > > moratorium > > next week. I'll look into that and get back to everyone. > > > > On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 10:34 +0000, Tandy, Jeremy wrote: > > > Hi Ed – what a lovely Christmas present indeed! This is the FPWD, > > > yes? Well done to the team 😃 > > > > > > The process we’ve used before starts with approval from the > > > [Working > > > > Interest] Group. We’re not due to meet soon, so an email to the > > > > > > mailing list asking for feedback/approval should work. We can > > > assume > > > ‘unanimous consent’ even if you’ve nil responses before a given > > > date. > > > > > > Then there’s a bunch of technical stuff to do to convert the doc > > > so > > > it’s ready for the W3C webmaster to publish. @ted@w3.org can walk > > > us > > > through that. (ReSpec validation*, Link Checker, W3C Style Guide, > > > spell check** etc.) > > > > > > * I see you have one respect warning to fix > > > ** American English – I think you’ve already got that; > > > e.g.“internalize” rather than “internalise” > > > > > > @Linda van den Brink, @ted@w3.org – how long should we allow the > > > IG > > > for review and comment? > > > > > > Jeremy > > > > > > From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> > > > Sent: 17 December 2020 10:19 > > > To: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>; Jeremy Tandy < > > > jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>; Linda van den Brink < > > > l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> > > > Cc: public-sdwig <public-sdwig@w3.org> > > > Subject: A Christmas Present > > > > > > This email was received from an external source. Always check > > > sender details, links & attachments. > > > Hello Both, > > > > > > The small team of elves working on the Responsible Use note would > > > like to publish the editor's draft next week to give everyone a > > > much > > > needed treat for the holidays ;-) > > > > > > We can't remember the formal steps to do this, so we would be > > > grateful for your advice... > > > > > > Ed & Joe et al > > > Ed Parsons Geospatial Technologist > > > eparsons@google.com +44 7825 382263 @edparsons > > > -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> W3C Automotive Lead https://www.w3.org/auto
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2020 15:04:11 UTC