Re: A Christmas Present

Ed and Jo,

If we want to publish this year before the moratorium starting
tomorrow, we will need a new shortname. Opening an issue in case that
triggers a response in time. If not, then in the new year.

A colleague suggested spatial-data-use and if you want to instead keep
the term responsible, how about responsible-spatial?

Cheers,

On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 10:04 -0500, Ted Guild wrote:
> Ed,
> 
> It was recommended we do something geospatial specific for the
> shortname as responsible-use could apply to any one of a number of
> areas. spatial-data-use was suggested but open to alternatives.
> 
> On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 09:56 -0500, Ted Guild wrote:
> > We're in luck, FPWD for a Note doesn't require call for consensus
> > and
> > moratorium goes from 23 December through 5 January. I'll prepare
> > the
> > document for 22 December and follow up with Ed if there are any
> > more
> > substantive tweaks that I shouldn't resolve without his input.
> > 
> > On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 09:43 -0500, Ted Guild wrote:
> > > We typically keep publications with advance notice to
> > > Tuesdays/Thursdays except for those that can be automated, which
> > > doesn't include a FPWD. We might be starting a publishing
> > > moratorium
> > > next week. I'll look into that and get back to everyone. 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2020-12-17 at 10:34 +0000, Tandy, Jeremy wrote:
> > > > Hi Ed – what a lovely Christmas present indeed! This is the
> > > > FPWD,
> > > > yes? Well done to the team 😃
> > > >  
> > > > The process we’ve used before starts with approval from the
> > > > [Working
> > > > > Interest] Group. We’re not due to meet soon, so an email to
> > > > > the
> > > > 
> > > > mailing list asking for feedback/approval should work. We can
> > > > assume
> > > > ‘unanimous consent’ even if you’ve nil responses before a given
> > > > date.
> > > >  
> > > > Then there’s a bunch of technical stuff to do to convert the
> > > > doc
> > > > so
> > > > it’s ready for the W3C webmaster to publish. @ted@w3.org can
> > > > walk
> > > > us
> > > > through that. (ReSpec validation*, Link Checker, W3C Style
> > > > Guide,
> > > > spell check** etc.)
> > > >  
> > > > * I see you have one respect warning to fix
> > > > ** American English – I think you’ve already got that;
> > > > e.g.“internalize” rather than “internalise”
> > > >  
> > > > @Linda van den Brink, @ted@w3.org – how long should we allow
> > > > the
> > > > IG
> > > > for review and comment?
> > > >  
> > > > Jeremy
> > > >  
> > > > From: Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com> 
> > > > Sent: 17 December 2020 10:19
> > > > To: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>; Jeremy Tandy
> > > > <
> > > > jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>; Linda van den Brink <
> > > > l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> > > > Cc: public-sdwig <public-sdwig@w3.org>
> > > > Subject: A Christmas Present
> > > >  
> > > > This email was received from an external source.   Always check
> > > > sender details, links & attachments.
> > > > Hello Both,
> > > >  
> > > > The small team of elves working on the Responsible Use note
> > > > would
> > > > like to publish the editor's draft next week to give everyone a
> > > > much
> > > > needed treat for the holidays ;-)  
> > > >  
> > > > We can't remember the formal steps to do this, so we would be
> > > > grateful for your advice...
> > > >  
> > > > Ed & Joe et al
> > > >         Ed Parsons  Geospatial Technologist   
> > > > eparsons@google.com   +44 7825 382263 @edparsons     
> > > >  
-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead
https://www.w3.org/auto