RE: Review: New charter

SO: these items need to be added to the work program here https://www.w3.org/2017/sdwig/ and here https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html



  *   WebVMT
  *   Time Ontology extensions – 1. Relations 2. Aggregates …
  *   GeoSPARQL (in collaboration with OGC)
  *   …

?

From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2020 12:01
To: janowicz@ucsb.edu
Cc: Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>; ted@w3.org; Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>; Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; public-sdwig@w3.org; Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
Subject: Re: Review: New charter

So would I.
Lewis

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:54 PM Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu<mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu>> wrote:
On 4/1/20 4:42 PM, Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) wrote:
> Is a GeoSPARQL refresh on the agenda?

I would be very interested in this part as well as would Blake Regalia.

Jano

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>>
> Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2020 01:32
> To: Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>>; Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl<mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>>; public-sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>
> Cc: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>>
> Subject: Re: Review: New charter
>
> On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 10:12 +0000, Little, Chris wrote:
>> Linda, Ted,
>>
>> Would a global change,  'Interest' -> 'Working', plus a few grammar
>> tweaks, do it?
> Mostly, I think some of the wording is too exploratory and Interest Group like whereas Working Groups are more focused on set of deliverables.
>
> We have a six month extension for the Interest Group. We may be working with OGC and others on a routing ontology and would like to see if that gets going and should be included in Working Group charter as a concrete spec for W3C Recommendations Track. Also I hope in May AC meeting we will have a clear answer on Ever-teal (evergreen) specifications at W3C that demonstrate maturity but are expected to receive ongoing modifications as that makes sense for ontology work.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl<mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>>
>> Sent: 01 April 2020 09:13
>> To: ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>; public-sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>
>> Cc: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>>
>> Subject: RE: Review: New charter
>>
>> I would prefer that!
>>
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>>
>> Verzonden: dinsdag 31 maart 2020 14:36
>> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl<mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>>;
>> public-sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>
>> CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>) <
>> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>>
>> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
>>
>> It can pursue other interests and recharter if those mature for formal
>> standards development.
>>
>> On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 06:39 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
>>> I think it does make sense. The SSN and OWL-Time errata and
>>> extensions are better at home in a WG, at least.
>>>
>>> I'm hesitant to have an IG as well, running two groups might mean
>>> more overhead... Couldn't the WG be scoped to manage the other
>>> interests as well, besides the concrete deliverables?
>>>
>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>> Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>>
>>> Verzonden: maandag 30 maart 2020 17:15
>>> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl<mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>>;
>>> public-sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>
>>> CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>) <
>>> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>>
>>> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> W3C Management is encouraging us to draft a charter for a Working
>>> Group given the amount of work on REC track. A question is whether
>>> to also have an Interest Group given the number of well, interests
>>> besides what we can presently list as deliverables.
>>>
>>> What are others' thoughts?
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 12:59 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I updated the charter today (finally…) and resolved all the
>>>> comments.
>>>>
>>>> I believe the charter as it is now formulated at
>>>> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html can go ahead
>>>> through the W3C approval process. @ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>, what’s the next
>>>> step for that?
>>>>
>>>> I confirmed with Scott Simmons that at the OGC side, nothing needs
>>>> to be done in this case.
>>>>
>>>> Linda
>>>>
>>>> Van: Rob Smith <rob.smith@awayteam.co.uk<mailto:rob.smith@awayteam.co.uk>>
>>>> Verzonden: donderdag 27 februari 2020 14:01
>>>> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl<mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>>
>>>> CC: public-sdwig@w3.org<mailto:public-sdwig@w3.org>; ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>; Jeremy Tandy (
>>>> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk<mailto:jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>>
>>>> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
>>>>
>>>> Linda,
>>>>
>>>> Apologies the delay in replying.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I think it would be beneficial to include a WebVMT Note
>>>> deliverable in the new charter. There are a number of items
>>>> currently incubating for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft, and
>>>> publishing a Note subsequently would be a good aim.
>>>>
>>>> The groups for WebVMT coordination at W3C are the Media Timed
>>>> Events Task Force [1], which is part of the Media & Entertainment
>>>> IG, and WICG DataCue [2] for video metadata. I’m unsure of MTE TF
>>>> charter status, but will confirm with Chris Needham and let you
>>>> know. I can also confirm that the relevant OGC groups are ARML for
>>>> camera, Moving Features for interpolation and Sensor Things for
>>>> data sync, which are already included in the current charter. The
>>>> other possible connection is OGC Geopose [3], again for camera.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help, and please let me know if you need any
>>>> further details.
>>>>
>>>> Rob Smith
>>>>
>>>> Away Team
>>>> www.awayteam.co.uk<http://www.awayteam.co.uk>
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
> https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Media_Timed_Events_TF

>>>> [2] https://github.com/WICG/datacue/ [3]
>>>> https://www.ogc.org/projects/groups/geoposeswg

>>>>
>>>>> On 18 Feb 2020, at 10:54, Linda van den Brink <
>>>>> l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl<mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear SDWIG members,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ted and I have been working on the charter renewal for our
>>>>> group.
>>>>> We would like the charter’s start date to be 1 April 2020 (which
>>>>> is a bit ambitious, but let’s go for it). Please send in your
>>>>> comments within two weeks as a reply to this email. We will also
>>>>> consider pull requests.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a specific question for @Rob Smith;
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you want the charter to mention a Note about WebVMT as a
>>>>> specific work item, and/or to add the web media text tracks
>>>>> community group to the list of W3C groups to coordinate with?
>>>>>
>>>>> @all: Please let us know if any other work item should be
>>>>> mentioned explicitly.
>>>>>
>>>>> The draft charter is at:
>>>>> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html

>>>>>
>>>>> Linda
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Away Team
>>>> www.awayteam.co.uk<http://www.awayteam.co.uk>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>>
>>> W3C Automotive Lead
>>> https://www.w3.org/auto

>>>
>> --
>> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>>
>> W3C Automotive Lead
>> https://www.w3.org/auto

>>
> --
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org<mailto:ted@w3.org>>
> W3C Automotive Lead
> https://www.w3.org/auto

>

--
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu<mailto:jano@geog.ucsb.edu>
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/

Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net




--
Lewis
Dr. Lewis J. McGibbney Ph.D, B.Sc
Skype: lewis.john.mcgibbney