W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdwig@w3.org > April 2020

Re: Review: New charter

From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 18:01:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGaRif32A0zwz9aEXRrRLZvrwuvjZZAeGEH99Xku4zSuz6xSWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: janowicz@ucsb.edu
Cc: "Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton)" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, "ted@w3.org" <ted@w3.org>, "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>, Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>, "Tandy, Jeremy" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
So would I.
Lewis

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:54 PM Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu> wrote:

> On 4/1/20 4:42 PM, Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) wrote:
> > Is a GeoSPARQL refresh on the agenda?
>
> I would be very interested in this part as well as would Blake Regalia.
>
> Jano
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, 2 April, 2020 01:32
> > To: Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>; Linda van den Brink <
> l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; public-sdwig@w3.org
> > Cc: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> > Subject: Re: Review: New charter
> >
> > On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 10:12 +0000, Little, Chris wrote:
> >> Linda, Ted,
> >>
> >> Would a global change,  'Interest' -> 'Working', plus a few grammar
> >> tweaks, do it?
> > Mostly, I think some of the wording is too exploratory and Interest
> Group like whereas Working Groups are more focused on set of deliverables.
> >
> > We have a six month extension for the Interest Group. We may be working
> with OGC and others on a routing ontology and would like to see if that
> gets going and should be included in Working Group charter as a concrete
> spec for W3C Recommendations Track. Also I hope in May AC meeting we will
> have a clear answer on Ever-teal (evergreen) specifications at W3C that
> demonstrate maturity but are expected to receive ongoing modifications as
> that makes sense for ontology work.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> >> Sent: 01 April 2020 09:13
> >> To: ted@w3.org; public-sdwig@w3.org
> >> Cc: Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> >> Subject: RE: Review: New charter
> >>
> >> I would prefer that!
> >>
> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >> Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> >> Verzonden: dinsdag 31 maart 2020 14:36
> >> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>;
> >> public-sdwig@w3.org
> >> CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <
> >> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> >> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
> >>
> >> It can pursue other interests and recharter if those mature for formal
> >> standards development.
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 06:39 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> >>> I think it does make sense. The SSN and OWL-Time errata and
> >>> extensions are better at home in a WG, at least.
> >>>
> >>> I'm hesitant to have an IG as well, running two groups might mean
> >>> more overhead... Couldn't the WG be scoped to manage the other
> >>> interests as well, besides the concrete deliverables?
> >>>
> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >>> Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> >>> Verzonden: maandag 30 maart 2020 17:15
> >>> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>;
> >>> public-sdwig@w3.org
> >>> CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <
> >>> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> >>> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
> >>>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> W3C Management is encouraging us to draft a charter for a Working
> >>> Group given the amount of work on REC track. A question is whether
> >>> to also have an Interest Group given the number of well, interests
> >>> besides what we can presently list as deliverables.
> >>>
> >>> What are others' thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 12:59 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I updated the charter today (finally…) and resolved all the
> >>>> comments.
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe the charter as it is now formulated at
> >>>> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html can go ahead
> >>>> through the W3C approval process. @ted@w3.org, what’s the next
> >>>> step for that?
> >>>>
> >>>> I confirmed with Scott Simmons that at the OGC side, nothing needs
> >>>> to be done in this case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Linda
> >>>>
> >>>> Van: Rob Smith <rob.smith@awayteam.co.uk>
> >>>> Verzonden: donderdag 27 februari 2020 14:01
> >>>> Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
> >>>> CC: public-sdwig@w3.org; ted@w3.org; Jeremy Tandy (
> >>>> jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> >>>> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter
> >>>>
> >>>> Linda,
> >>>>
> >>>> Apologies the delay in replying.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, I think it would be beneficial to include a WebVMT Note
> >>>> deliverable in the new charter. There are a number of items
> >>>> currently incubating for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft, and
> >>>> publishing a Note subsequently would be a good aim.
> >>>>
> >>>> The groups for WebVMT coordination at W3C are the Media Timed
> >>>> Events Task Force [1], which is part of the Media & Entertainment
> >>>> IG, and WICG DataCue [2] for video metadata. I’m unsure of MTE TF
> >>>> charter status, but will confirm with Chris Needham and let you
> >>>> know. I can also confirm that the relevant OGC groups are ARML for
> >>>> camera, Moving Features for interpolation and Sensor Things for
> >>>> data sync, which are already included in the current charter. The
> >>>> other possible connection is OGC Geopose [3], again for camera.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your help, and please let me know if you need any
> >>>> further details.
> >>>>
> >>>> Rob Smith
> >>>>
> >>>> Away Team
> >>>> www.awayteam.co.uk
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> > https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Media_Timed_Events_TF
> >>>> [2] https://github.com/WICG/datacue/ [3]
> >>>> https://www.ogc.org/projects/groups/geoposeswg
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 18 Feb 2020, at 10:54, Linda van den Brink <
> >>>>> l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dear SDWIG members,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ted and I have been working on the charter renewal for our
> >>>>> group.
> >>>>> We would like the charter’s start date to be 1 April 2020 (which
> >>>>> is a bit ambitious, but let’s go for it). Please send in your
> >>>>> comments within two weeks as a reply to this email. We will also
> >>>>> consider pull requests.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have a specific question for @Rob Smith;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Do you want the charter to mention a Note about WebVMT as a
> >>>>> specific work item, and/or to add the web media text tracks
> >>>>> community group to the list of W3C groups to coordinate with?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @all: Please let us know if any other work item should be
> >>>>> mentioned explicitly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The draft charter is at:
> >>>>> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Linda
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Away Team
> >>>> www.awayteam.co.uk
> >>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> >>> W3C Automotive Lead
> >>> https://www.w3.org/auto
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> >> W3C Automotive Lead
> >> https://www.w3.org/auto
> >>
> > --
> > Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> > W3C Automotive Lead
> > https://www.w3.org/auto
> >
>
> --
> Krzysztof Janowicz
>
> Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
> 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060
>
> Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
> Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
> Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
>
>
>

-- 

*Lewis*
Dr. Lewis J. McGibbney Ph.D, B.Sc
*Skype*: lewis.john.mcgibbney
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2020 01:01:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 April 2020 01:01:48 UTC