- From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 08:12:56 +0000
- To: "ted@w3.org" <ted@w3.org>, "public-sdwig@w3.org" <public-sdwig@w3.org>
- CC: "Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk)" <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
I would prefer that! -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> Verzonden: dinsdag 31 maart 2020 14:36 Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; public-sdwig@w3.org CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter It can pursue other interests and recharter if those mature for formal standards development. On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 06:39 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote: > I think it does make sense. The SSN and OWL-Time errata and extensions > are better at home in a WG, at least. > > I'm hesitant to have an IG as well, running two groups might mean more > overhead... Couldn't the WG be scoped to manage the other interests as > well, besides the concrete deliverables? > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> > Verzonden: maandag 30 maart 2020 17:15 > Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; > public-sdwig@w3.org > CC: Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) < > jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> > Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter > > Hi all, > > W3C Management is encouraging us to draft a charter for a Working > Group given the amount of work on REC track. A question is whether to > also have an Interest Group given the number of well, interests > besides what we can presently list as deliverables. > > What are others' thoughts? > > On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 12:59 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I updated the charter today (finally…) and resolved all the > > comments. > > > > I believe the charter as it is now formulated at > > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html can go ahead > > through the W3C approval process. @ted@w3.org, what’s the next step > > for that? > > > > I confirmed with Scott Simmons that at the OGC side, nothing needs > > to be done in this case. > > > > Linda > > > > Van: Rob Smith <rob.smith@awayteam.co.uk> > > Verzonden: donderdag 27 februari 2020 14:01 > > Aan: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> > > CC: public-sdwig@w3.org; ted@w3.org; Jeremy Tandy ( > > jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk) <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk> > > Onderwerp: Re: Review: New charter > > > > Linda, > > > > Apologies the delay in replying. > > > > Yes, I think it would be beneficial to include a WebVMT Note > > deliverable in the new charter. There are a number of items > > currently incubating for inclusion in the Editor’s Draft, and > > publishing a Note subsequently would be a good aim. > > > > The groups for WebVMT coordination at W3C are the Media Timed Events > > Task Force [1], which is part of the Media & Entertainment IG, and > > WICG DataCue [2] for video metadata. I’m unsure of MTE TF charter > > status, but will confirm with Chris Needham and let you know. I can > > also confirm that the relevant OGC groups are ARML for camera, > > Moving Features for interpolation and Sensor Things for data sync, > > which are already included in the current charter. The other > > possible connection is OGC Geopose [3], again for camera. > > > > Thanks for your help, and please let me know if you need any further > > details. > > > > Rob Smith > > > > Away Team > > www.awayteam.co.uk > > > > [1] > > https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Media_Timed_Events_TF > > [2] https://github.com/WICG/datacue/ [3] > > https://www.ogc.org/projects/groups/geoposeswg > > > > > On 18 Feb 2020, at 10:54, Linda van den Brink < > > > l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl> wrote: > > > > > > Dear SDWIG members, > > > > > > Ted and I have been working on the charter renewal for our group. > > > We would like the charter’s start date to be 1 April 2020 (which > > > is a bit ambitious, but let’s go for it). Please send in your > > > comments within two weeks as a reply to this email. We will also > > > consider pull requests. > > > > > > I have a specific question for @Rob Smith; > > > > > > Do you want the charter to mention a Note about WebVMT as a > > > specific work item, and/or to add the web media text tracks > > > community group to the list of W3C groups to coordinate with? > > > > > > @all: Please let us know if any other work item should be > > > mentioned explicitly. > > > > > > The draft charter is at: > > > https://w3c.github.io/sdw/roadmap/charter-2020.html > > > > > > Linda > > > > > > > > > > Away Team > > www.awayteam.co.uk > > > > -- > Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> > W3C Automotive Lead > https://www.w3.org/auto > -- Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> W3C Automotive Lead https://www.w3.org/auto
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2020 08:13:17 UTC