Re: Recap Toulouse face to face

Hi Simon,

As it was previously a [First Public] Working Draft I requested
permission to publish it as a Working Draft. Some prefer WD to Notes as
having more weight as a specification although that is a matter of
perception. I spoke with Philippe Le Hegaret with his Director hat on
and he is inclined, awaiting email confirmation.

I viewed the support for the updates presented at the face to face as
approval but Linda or Jeremy may wish to formalize with a call for
consensus. That can be done simply as an email to this list with a
deadline, typically five business days as I recall, to voice objection.

On Sun, 2019-12-08 at 22:00 +0000, Cox, Simon (L&W, Clayton) wrote:
> Draft of SSN-EXT is here: 
> https://w3c.github.io/sdw/proposals/ssn-extensions/ 
> I would like this to be issued ASAP as a new PWD, replacing 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn-ext/ which was published a year ago
> now. 
> How do we initiate a vote to allow this? 
> 
> IMO it is pretty close to done now, so after responding to comments
> in response to PWD, I would then like to look towards this being
> issued by this IG as a W3C Note / OGC Discussion Paper. 
> 
> Simon 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> 
> Sent: Saturday, 7 December, 2019 00:03
> To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>; 
> public-sdwig@w3.org; Tandy, Jeremy <jeremy.tandy@metoffice.gov.uk>
> Subject: Re: Recap Toulouse face to face
> 
> Minutes are online, corrections welcome. In particular need link for
> Rob's slides and and issue he mentioned on github and a project Esa
> mentioned, look for @@ for context.
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2019/11/19-sdw-minutes
> 
> On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 10:09 +0000, Linda van den Brink wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >  
> > Here’s a short recap of the face to face meeting we had in Toulouse
> > at 
> > the OGC TC.
> >  
> > SSN extension
> > Simon Cox presented the latest Editor’s draft of the SSN
> > Extensions 
> > document [1]. The idea is to publish a new WD of this document
> > (which 
> > is intended to be a W3C Note / OGC Discussion paper). He has asked
> > the 
> > group for review [2] Ted Guild will help navigate this through the 
> > process once the group agrees to publish this as a new WD. The new 
> > ‘evergreen’ standards process of W3C may be applicable.
> >  
> > WebVMT
> > Rob Smith gave an update on the WebVMT work. It’s still in
> > incubation 
> > phase, partly within the Web Platform Incubator Community Group.
> > Contact with browser developers has been initiated, revealing that 
> > there has been previous work on video geotagging but at the time
> > no 
> > consensus was reached. There seems to be some interest in doing
> > this 
> > now.
> >  
> > MapML
> > The community around MapML is slowly developing; Peter Rushforth
> > did 
> > some community building at TPAC this year and talked to browser 
> > developers from Agalia, Beaucoup, Firefox, Chrome. There is also a 
> > draft use cases & requirements document [3]. On the OGC side MapML
> > is 
> > being worked on in testbed 15. Peter and Ted will look into
> > organizing 
> > a W3C workshop on maps in HTML.
> >  
> > Discussion on charter
> > The general feeling about the proposed charter is positive; those 
> > present agreed we should move this charter forward. There were
> > some 
> > pointers to improve the text. The chairs will transfer the charter 
> > text to the right template and further improve the text. When 
> > rechartering we may want to think about promoting the group some,
> > in 
> > order to remind the W3C and OGC membership what we’re doing.
> >  
> > Linked building data
> > Mathias Bonduel and others from the Linked building data community 
> > group joined to present their work. They are working on ontologies
> > for 
> > linked building data, collecting use cases, requirements,
> > developing 
> > best practices and ontologies, in the future planning to evolve to
> > a 
> > W3C WG. They are contacting the SDWIG to see if OGC can help with 
> > their use cases related to geometry and topology. This turns out to
> > be 
> > related to the OWL Space / GeoSPARQL 2.0 work, currently discussed
> > in 
> > the OGC Geosemantics working group, which they were invited to
> > join. 
> > Another potentially interesting OGC standard is IndoorGML which 
> > describes topology of buildings.
> >  
> > SDW Finland
> > Esa Tiainen presented remotely [4] on low hanging fruit and how to 
> > move forward with spatial data on the web.
> >  
> > OGC technology trends
> > George Percivall presented the tech trends [5] OGC has their eye
> > on 
> > and asks the group if there are more trends to record within the 
> > spatial web data trend group.
> >  
> > [1]: https://w3c.github.io/sdw/proposals/ssn-extensions/
> > [2]: 
> > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdwig/2019Nov/0029.html
> > [3]: 
> > https://maps4html.github.io/HTML-Map-Element-UseCases-Requirements/
> > [4]: 
> > 
https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/meetings/f2f-5-presentation-e
> > sa-tiainen.pdf
> > [5]: 
> > 
https://github.com/w3c/sdw/blob/gh-pages/meetings/f2f-5-OGC-tech-trend
> > s-for-SDWIG.pdf
> 
> --
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> W3C Automotive Lead
> https://www.w3.org/auto
> 
-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Automotive Lead
https://www.w3.org/auto