[sdw] ssn:extension proposal comment: Note in section 3.1 (#1152)

smrgeoinfo has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/sdw:

== ssn:extension proposal comment: Note in section 3.1 ==
Text in note on 'ultimate feature of interest' states:

> That approach was unnecessarily coy about satisfying the principle requirement, which is to know the ultimate feature of interest.

Seems to me that the OM-Light approach is as direct (not really that 'coy') than the proposed sosa approach, but more indirect in its ability to represent a sampling or observation chain.  
possible revised text:

> That approach was unclear because of the multiple possible interpretations of ‘featureOfInterest’, as well as its indirect representation of chains of sampling or observation events.

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/1152 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 9 December 2019 16:52:18 UTC