Re: Poll for a telcon on Tech Trends coordination (SDWIG ACTION-391)

Hi George - thanks for setting up the Doodle Poll. Do you anticipate having
a draft of the restructured `chapter-05.adoc` [1] available for discussion
/ review ahead of the telecon?

My notes from the SDW-IG F2F say:

```
ACTION (George Percival)
- make proposals for the SDW branch of the mind map
- “Iterate the AsciiDoc” for Chapt 5 of the Technology Trends
- Consider how to link the geospatial items in the W3C Strategy Funnel and
SDW-IG Projects ... and whether they should all appear as a leaf-node in
the TT mindmap.
```

Many thanks! Jeremy

[1]:
https://github.com/opengeospatial/OGC-Technology-Trends/blob/master/chapter-05.adoc
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 22:04, George Percivall <
gpercivall@opengeospatial.org> wrote:

> During the SDWIG F2F in Fort Collins, we discussed coordination of the
> SDWIG funnel with the OGC technology forecasting activity.  I accepted the
> action to arrange a telecon to advance the discussion.
>
> If you are interested in contributing to the telecon, please complete this
> poll: https://doodle.com/poll/iadahamrvz7kgb8x
>
> Topic for discussion in the telecon:
> - The SDWIG funnel and the OGC Tech Trends have related but differing
> purposes.  Both activities aim to identify opportunities of emerging
> technology that might be related to development of geospatial innovation
> through standards.  The Tech Trends is focused on “after next” with the OGC
> SP and IP taking action on “now” and “next” topics.  The SDWIG may include
> all horizons.
> - Specific topics may be discussed such as MapML and WebVMT
> - The OGC technology forecasting includes a topic about Spatial Data on
> the Web.  This telecon will consider SDWIG recommended changes to that
> branch on the tech trends mindmap.  Other trends listed on the mindmap will
> also be considered.
>         https://github.com/opengeospatial/OGC-Technology-Trends
> - The SDWIG is developing a Geospatial Roadmap of features, standards, and
> developments in Web-friendly geospatial capabilities. The evolving criteria
> for including OGC developments and placing them along the Roadmap could be
> useful feedback, particularly for OWS Evolution. (This is also an OAB issue)
>
> Regards,
> George
>
>
>
> > On Jun 5, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Issue
> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > ACTION-391: Arrange telcon and send out details (Spatial Data on the Web
> Working Group)
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/391
> >
> > On: George Percivall
> > Due: 2018-06-12
> >
> > If you do not want to be notified on new action items for this group,
> please update your settings at:
> > https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/users/39414#settings
> >
>
>
>