- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 08:41:11 -0700
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 15:41:53 UTC
Hi, Please find the relevant part of the email from John Hodges I mentioned before (forwarded with his permission). Krzysztof -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Question about SSN Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 16:35:28 +0000 From: HODGES Jr, John <jack.hodges@siemens.com> To: janowicz@ucsb.edu <janowicz@ucsb.edu> CC: HODGES Jr, John <jack.hodges@siemens.com> Good morning Jano, [...] He and I are having a disagreement about ssn:Property mapping to QUDT. The rdfs:comment says that ssn:Property is intrinsic to an entity, which would suggest that it is most equivalent to qudt:QuantityKind. But if I look at the rdfs:comment for ssn:Condition (which subclasses ssn:Property), and published examples, then I see that ssn:Condition relates a property, a value, and a unit, which seems more like a qudt:QuantityValue. A subclass that can represent value would suggest that the parent can represent value, so I am confused. We can go either way, but if the intention of the ssn:Property definition is one way or the other, then of course we would want to honor that intention. Comments? Best regards, Dr. Jack Hodges [...]
Received on Friday, 5 May 2017 15:41:53 UTC