W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > May 2017

RE: Use of Void

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 12:39:12 +0000
To: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>, "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D2D65C3@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
On Tuesday, May 02, 2017 2:21 PM, Linda van den Brink [mailto:l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl] wrote:

> This concerns ACTION-292: Ask Kadaster about use of void.
> I did; they are indeed using it but currently not very extensively. They are planning to
> use it in their metadata descriptions, based on the DCAT NL profile. They are
> anticipating using Void for linking the vocabulary to the dataset.

Regarding the use of VoID together with DCAT(-AP) there was an interesting thread on public-lod [1]. There were several suggestions, one being to use dcat:Dataset for the abstract notion of dataset (analogous to frbr:Work), void:Dataset for specific specialisations of the dataset (MARC 21, RDF, ...) analogous to frbr:Expression and then dcat:Distributions for the things you can download [2].

[1] starting at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2017Mar/0014.html
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2017Mar/0020.html


Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2017 12:39:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 2 May 2017 12:39:51 UTC