W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > June 2017

RE: Re: Group endorses SOSA being taken up by schema.org

From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:43:06 +0000
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Simon Cox <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
CC: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <24637769D123E644A105A0AF0E1F92EF010D2E0888@dnbf-ex1.AD.DDB.DE>
On Friday, June 16, 2017 1:50 PM, Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@google.com] wrote:

> On the Google side regarding dataset discovery and
> https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/datasets we're currently
> consuming basic DCAT (if expressed in json-ld, rdfa, or microdata) as alongside
> Schema.org dataset descriptions in any of those. My sense is that much of the
> vocabulary needed to improve the state of things is already around (CSVW, Data Cube,
> DC, DCAT, Schema.org, SKOS, SOSA, QUDT, etc.), but there's a need to figure out
> ways of combining them. So the likes of https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/ may prove
> useful for capturing such patterns (as well as simple examples / documentation of
> course). There is also btw some potential via JSON-LD context files to hide some multi-
> namespace complexity via indirection, since the @context can map a seemingly flat set
> of terms into several different "behind the scenes" namespaces.

Sounds like a use case for profiles to me...

/Lars
Received on Friday, 16 June 2017 12:43:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:33 UTC