- From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:43:06 +0000
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Simon Cox <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- CC: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org)" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
On Friday, June 16, 2017 1:50 PM, Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@google.com] wrote: > On the Google side regarding dataset discovery and > https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/datasets we're currently > consuming basic DCAT (if expressed in json-ld, rdfa, or microdata) as alongside > Schema.org dataset descriptions in any of those. My sense is that much of the > vocabulary needed to improve the state of things is already around (CSVW, Data Cube, > DC, DCAT, Schema.org, SKOS, SOSA, QUDT, etc.), but there's a need to figure out > ways of combining them. So the likes of https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/ may prove > useful for capturing such patterns (as well as simple examples / documentation of > course). There is also btw some potential via JSON-LD context files to hide some multi- > namespace complexity via indirection, since the @context can map a seemingly flat set > of terms into several different "behind the scenes" namespaces. Sounds like a use case for profiles to me... /Lars
Received on Friday, 16 June 2017 12:43:45 UTC