- From: Linda van den Brink <l.vandenbrink@geonovum.nl>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 06:27:35 +0000
- To: "janowicz@ucsb.edu" <janowicz@ucsb.edu>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
- CC: "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <13F9BF0BE056DA42BFE5AA6E476CDEFE0140F8A69A@GNMSRV01.gnm.local>
Hi Dan, As one who was mostly involved with the SDW best practice I would definitely welcome this! Linda Van: Krzysztof Janowicz [mailto:janowicz@ucsb.edu] Verzonden: woensdag 7 juni 2017 04:20 Aan: Dan Brickley; Armin Haller CC: public-sdw-wg@w3.org Onderwerp: Re: Implementation evidence - Producers Hi Dan, I cannot speak for the entire SDW group but creating synergies between SOSA/SSN and schema.org was one of our design goals (for SOSA). So, at least as far as I am concerned, I would be very happy if you would look into what we did for SOSA. Best, Jano On 06/06/2017 05:19 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: I'd be happy to explore that, but it would be good to have some (even informal) encouragement from the SDW WG that this would be a welcome development. We did something similar with a DCAT-based Dataset design a while ago and it seems that we inadvertently caused some frustration as it was seen as a fork. It would be a pity to try to adopt a design based on SOSA (or SOSA/SSN) and for that to be seen in a similar way. Do you think the WG would welcome such an effort? Dan On 7 June 2017 at 00:37, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au<mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>> wrote: Hi Dan, SSN http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/ is now in rec-track and we are to collect implementation evidences in the next 4 weeks. In fact, we need to show demonstrated use in at least two producer implementations and two consumer implementations, with producer implementations, according to our interpretation of the Director’s words meaning that there needs to be two ontologies that extend each term of SOSA/SSN. You indicated earlier in the working group that you would likely take the simple SOSA core and integrate all or parts of it in Schema.org. Would that be something you could kick off in the next 4 weeks with maybe a Change request to schema.org<http://schema.org>? Cheers, Armin -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu<mailto:jano@geog.ucsb.edu> Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2017 06:28:08 UTC