Re: Input for BP7?

Hi Bart. I see from notes it was PR #453 [1] ...

your merge comments say:
»»


   - Updated wording of BP11
   - readded R2RML in BP4
   - Updated image with URI

««

I'll try to make sure that these elements are in the Editor's Draft.

Jeremy

[1]: https://github.com/w3c/sdw/pull/453

On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 at 17:42 Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
wrote:

> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Before the December sprint I've made some modifications and created a PR,
> back then Linda informed me that not everything made it to PWD at that time.
> I'll have a look again at my fork and compare it to the editors draft.
>
> Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
> Bart van Leeuwen
>
>
> twitter: @semanticfire
> tel. +31(0)6-53182997 <+31%206%2053182997>
> Netage B.V.
> http://netage.nl
> Esdoornstraat 3
> 3461ER Linschoten
> The Netherlands
>
>
>
>
> From:        Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
> To:        Bart van Leeuwen <Bart_van_Leeuwen@netage.nl>, SDW WG Public
> List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
> Date:        28-01-2017 08:37
> Subject:        Input for BP7?
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Bart. As we race toward the date for completion of another sprint on
> the Best Practice doc I realise that I have not talked with you to make
> sure I include your proposals in the upcoming edit.
>
> During the BP sub-group call you said there was some stuff for BP7?
>
> I don't see any PRs from you ...
>
> Do you want to send me the outline text (by email, or in a side branch of
> the GitHub repo) and I'll try to incorporate that into my edit(s)?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Jeremy
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2017 14:00:00 UTC