- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 22:20:58 +0100
- To: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com>
On 04/04/2017 22:11, Raphaël Troncy wrote: [..] > I'm not comfortable with the vote that has been setup, in particular, > because a subset of possible choices have been voted by a sub-committee. I think that's a little unfair, Raphaël. The decision to have a common base name was discussed at length at the F2F, during the session set aside for SSN. What that common base name is, and what the prefixes might be, are up for discussion - which is what this thread is about. Kerry is trying to offer a straightforward choice but at this stage, the door is open to alternative suffixes. Phil > > Raphaël > -- Phil Archer Data Strategist, W3C http://www.w3.org/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2017 21:21:02 UTC