Re: Voting on a name for ssn this week in plenary

Thanks Kerry for splitting this issue in simpler ones.

I won't be available for the plenary meeting this week, anyways I'd like to
state my preferences here:

1.a, 2.a, 3.a -->

@prefix sosa-lite: <http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa-lite/> .
@prefix sosa: <http://www.w3.org/ns/sosa/> .

More precisely:

1. STEM: (a) 1, (b) 0
2. SUFFIX: (a) 1, (b) 0, (c) 0
3. CONNECTOR: (a) 1, (b) 0, (c) 0

Best,
Maxime Lefrançois

Le mar. 4 avr. 2017 à 01:36, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au> a
écrit :

>  Dear SDW,
>
> As you recall, we have decided that the ssn/sosa ontologies will have two
> separate namespaces, but not what those namespaces are. This will be
> determined in the PLENARY meeting this week. If you cannot attend the
> plenary, please make your opinion known by reply to this email before the
> meeting.
>
>
>
> This issue can be separated into three:
>
>
>
> 1. STEM name
>
> Choose between
>
>                 (a) Sensor, Observation, Sample, and Actuator ontology–
> sosa
>
>                 (b) Semantic Sensor Network ontology – ssn
>
>
>
>
>
> 2. SUFFIX name
>
> Choose between
>
>                 (a) “lite”
>
>                 (b) “simple”
>
>                 (c)  “full”
>
>
>
>
>
> 3. CONNECTOR symbol
>
> Choose between
>
>                 (a) “-“  hyphen
>
>                 (b) “_” underscore
>
>                 (c) “”  nothing – juxtaposition only
>
>
>
> For example, choosing every (a) option  for 1, 2 and 3 would derive
> “sosa-lite” and “sosa” as the suffixes for the namespace uris and also
> the recommended namespace prefixes  for the simpler and fuller ontologies
> respectively. Choosing 1b,2c,3c would derive “ssn“ and “ssnfull”  for the
> simpler and fuller ontologies respectively.
>
>
>
> Please indicate your preference for each of the three questions
> independently --- as the result will combine the preferred option from each
> of the three questions.
>
>
>
> -Kerry
>