RE: Joint SDW paper

Thanks that is great!

My intention is the latter: a report on best practice as far as we have figured out now. I think it will be a useful exercise to write up the state of our knowledge and the gaps we see. A description of the process should also be present in the paper I think, but not be the focus.

Any suggestions for a title? I usually come up with the title last, but some people are good at doing that up front. We could just trim the title like this:

“A Report on Best Practices for Publication and Usage of Spatial Data on the Web”

Van: Krzysztof Janowicz [mailto:jano@geog.ucsb.edu]
Verzonden: donderdag 17 november 2016 21:02
Aan: Andrea Perego
CC: Linda van den Brink; SDW WG (public-sdw-wg@w3.org); Payam Barnaghi; Jeremy Tandy (jeremy.tandy@gmail.com)
Onderwerp: Re: Joint SDW paper

Same here, I will gladly help.

One important issue we probably have to work out early on is whether this is a report on the process of getting towards a best practice recommendation (this is what the title currently implies) or a report on best practice.
Best,
Krzysztof

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> wrote:
Thanks a lot for this initiative, Linda.

I'd be happy to contribute.

Cheers,

Andrea


On 17/11/2016 9:08, Linda van den Brink wrote:
Hi all,



As I announced at the very end of the telecon yesterday, I’m preparing a
paper about the SDW BP. Payam and I prepared an abstract and TOC, and
want to try getting it published in Semantic Web Journal. Of course the
work we’ll be writing about is done by all of you, so I want to list as
many of you as possible as co-authors. I even started adding everyone on
https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=75471&public=1 but there’s
about fifty names there…



So what I want to do is at least list the BP editors; followed by any
participant in this group who tells me they want to be listed as author
and contribute something. A contribution could be actually writing a bit
of text for the paper, or reviewing (a section of) the paper,
participate in discussions on the paper, give some input for the paper,
or just having been active on the BP work in this group.



In addition we’ll put an acknowledgement in the paper (a first draft of
that is already in the abstract). But I really don’t want anyone to feel
left out so _/please/_ don’t hesitate to let me know if you want to be
listed as an author! Just a reply with a simple ‘yes’ is enough.



The abstract of the paper is here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CAtrBt1P8TMtZDrZYU2Q9-RmtzeWxwl-iEMFfLn2uqg/edit?usp=sharing





Linda and Payam

--
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.