- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 21:23:49 -0800
- To: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "phila@w3.org" <phila@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <56DFB365.9080900@ucsb.edu>
Hi, I was confused by the alternating meeting times but should be able to join on both dates from next week on. Do we still have a meeting tomorrow (Wednesday)? Best, Krzysztof On 03/08/2016 04:25 PM, Armin Haller wrote: > We have discussed the modularisation in our sub-group meeting today. > Although there were no strong opinions, I think the consensus was that > too many modules may have the opposite effect and make the use of the > ontology more difficult. Some parts of the modularisation proposed > initially by Michael Compton are rather small (with few > classes/properties) such as the DevicesSystems and the > PlatformsDeployments modules. Having many different modules may cause > people to make more mistakes in importing the wrong modules. > > Before we decide on the modules, we agreed that it may be useful to > publish the current two modules in the W3C namespace (with the content > negotiation in place) and have people play around with the separation > of DOLCE from the SSN core. Once we have some experience how that > would work (in combination with the proposed slash URIs) we can > revisit further modularisation (even if it is only a separation of the > namespace, but delivered through one file). > > Cheers, > Armin > > From: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au <mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>" > <Simon.Cox@csiro.au <mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>> > Date: Friday, 4 March 2016 9:02 pm > To: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au > <mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org > <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org > <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>> > Cc: "phila@w3.org <mailto:phila@w3.org>" <phila@w3.org > <mailto:phila@w3.org>> > Subject: RE: [ssn] ssn sub-group regular meeting times are set > Resent-From: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>> > Resent-Date: Friday, 4 March 2016 9:02 pm > > Unfortunately I’m unlikely to make that time this week, as I both have > a visitor + am tasked with getting a teenager off to school ;) > > Please register my main concern/suggestion: that in re-factoring, > consider putting the details of sensor/system, observation, > feature-of-interest into separate modules, with perhaps a lightweight > skeleton over the top only containing a minimal set of stub classes. > > Have fun folks! > > Simon > > *From:*Kerry Taylor [mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au] > *Sent:* Friday, 4 March 2016 1:02 PM > *To:* public-sdw-wg@w3.org <mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org> > *Cc:* Phil Archer <phila@w3.org <mailto:phila@w3.org>> > *Subject:* [ssn] ssn sub-group regular meeting times are set > > SDW, > > Following the doodle poll, > > -Tuesday 8pm UTC ( Wed 7-8am Canberra) is most popular (although 2 > editors have said ifneedbe) > > -Thurs 8pm UTC ( Fri 7-8am Canberra) comes second but 2 editors > have said they cannot attend then. > > So the first of these seems to be the best option. > > That is, in your local time zone > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=SSN+meetings+of+SDW&iso=20160308T20&p1=%3A&ah=1 > > (you can get an ics file from there) > > That would make the first meeting *next week on Tuesday > night/Wednesday morning*. Then alternate weeks from thereon (the > intervening weeks will be main group meetings at the regular time). > > @Phila, can u pls set up the webex for us? It might be smart to set it > up for weekly so that we can do the in-between weeks as well when we > need to. > > Thanks, > > Kerry > -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2016 05:24:22 UTC