W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: [ssn] ssn sub-group regular meeting times are set

From: Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 00:25:55 +0000
To: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
CC: "phila@w3.org" <phila@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B57A59D7-AA76-4ED7-8C25-EDD11C280BD6@anu.edu.au>
We have discussed the modularisation in our sub-group meeting today. Although there were no strong opinions, I think the consensus was that too many modules may have the opposite effect and make the use of the ontology more difficult. Some parts of the modularisation proposed initially by Michael Compton are rather small (with few classes/properties) such as the DevicesSystems and the PlatformsDeployments modules. Having many different modules may cause people to make more mistakes in importing the wrong modules.

Before we decide on the modules, we agreed that it may be useful to publish the current two modules in the W3C namespace (with the content negotiation in place) and have people play around with the separation of DOLCE from the SSN core. Once we have some experience how that would work (in combination with the proposed slash URIs) we can revisit further modularisation (even if it is only a separation of the namespace, but delivered through one file).


From: "Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>>
Date: Friday, 4 March 2016 9:02 pm
To: Kerry Taylor <kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au<mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au>>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
Cc: "phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>" <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>>
Subject: RE: [ssn] ssn sub-group regular meeting times are set
Resent-From: <public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Friday, 4 March 2016 9:02 pm

Unfortunately I’m unlikely to make that time this week, as I both have a visitor + am tasked with getting a teenager off to school ;)

Please register my main concern/suggestion: that in re-factoring, consider putting the details of sensor/system, observation, feature-of-interest into separate modules, with perhaps a lightweight skeleton over the top only containing a minimal set of stub classes.

Have fun folks!


From: Kerry Taylor [mailto:kerry.taylor@anu.edu.au]
Sent: Friday, 4 March 2016 1:02 PM
To: public-sdw-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>>
Subject: [ssn] ssn sub-group regular meeting times are set

Following the doodle poll,

-          Tuesday  8pm UTC ( Wed 7-8am Canberra)  is most popular (although 2 editors have said ifneedbe)

-          Thurs 8pm UTC   ( Fri 7-8am Canberra)  comes second but 2 editors have said they cannot attend then.

So the first of these  seems to be the best option.

That is, in your local time zone

(you can get an ics file from there)

That would make the first meeting next week on Tuesday night/Wednesday morning. Then alternate weeks from thereon (the intervening weeks will be main group meetings at the regular time).

@Phila, can u pls set up the webex for us? It might be smart to set it up for weekly so that we can do the in-between weeks as well when we need to.


Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2016 00:26:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:20 UTC