- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:14:08 +0000
- To: SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfF9Ly0qEeSrWeAUR787HFxZhAsFWGNo3ZA0kpNto+tDo8AuA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I'm looking into the BP aspects around defining data dimensions as a framework for evaluating and contributing to various SDW threads. One which seems to cut across, but I havent seen an explicit treatment of the UoM problem. I know I may have missed previous conversatiosn - but I dont see any treatment in the current reviewable docs. Specifically, if I was to follow the W3C Data on the Web Best Practices I would be led via BP #2 "To express frequency of update an instance from the Content-Oriented Guidelines developed as part of the W3C Data Cube Vocabulary efforts was used." to this statement: "To express the value of this attribute we would typically use a common thesaurus of units of measure. For the sake of this simple example we will use the DBpedia resource http://dbpedia.org/resource/Year which corresponds to the topic of the Wikipedia page on "Years". If we have a Time ontology - surely we would be pointing to that as a recommendation for temporal units of measure. Likewise, i would have thought that OGC would have an interest in binding CRS with their in built units of measure to spatial dimensions. One could argue that without interoperability at this level there is a question why the OGC would have any involvement in Web standards - but if there is a counter-argument then I feel this needs to be front-and-centre of the BP to explain to a potential user what they can expect, and where they are going to be left with making all the significant decisions. If we have Time and CRS UoM, then we may be able to get away with not specifiying a vocabulary for other UoM for measurements. Are there any obvious dimensions that need UoM vocabularies? When I specify O&M profiles, (my driving use case), I'll need to specify the UoM for measurements - is there any recommendation regarding which vocabulary to choose? And for CRS based dimensions? Rob Atkinson
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2016 14:14:59 UTC