Re: SDW BP narrative location (and ISSUE 38)

Hi Rob. Sounds like progress. I'll stay tuned. Have a good weekend. Jeremy
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 at 17:35, Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au> wrote:

> Josh (in particular)...
> I have spent the day discussing requirements for describing data
> dimensions with Mark Hedly from the UK Met Office. My aim in the next week
> is to have a go at describing some common patterns - in particular how a
> dimension may support spatial, topological and feature-model related
> operations - such as traversing a nesting of catchments - or a nesting of
> irregular grids, or a codedDimension, or a time dimension. I am expecting
> this to need something like the spatial ontology - possibly GeoSPARQL will
> be adequate.  Stay tuned for some straw man hacks to discuss..
>
> Rob
>
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 at 01:42 Joshua Lieberman <
> jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com> wrote:
>
>> It isn’t necessarily a problem that “something” is a feature and also
>> something else (a data tuple, an issue, etc.). The dissonance is when there
>> is real world and/or property overlap between two features. Integration
>> then needs to be guided by some expression of the actual overlap and
>> consideration of whether the two features in question actually share the
>> same metalevel (e.g. pile of material versus conjunction of hopes and
>> dreams).
>>
>> Josh
>>
>>
>> On Jun 22, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Rob- following up discussion in the plenary call this week, the BP
>> Narrative is here:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Narrative_2
>>
>> You said that you'd try to identify implementation examples that fit in
>> the 9 scenarios we've identified.
>>
>> I also asked you to consider whether we should care about the fact that a
>> Feature (OGC / ISOTC211 parlance) can only be of one (and only one) Feature
>> Type (Class) where as in the web / linked data world a resource that is a
>> SpatialThing [1] may also be designated as other types of thing too ...
>> e.g. does this affect our ability to reconcile two Features that appear to
>> be talking about the same physical thing. This relates to the ISSUE 38
>> questions being discussed in another WG email thread [2]
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>> [1]: SpatialThing: “Anything with spatial extent, i.e. size, shape, or
>> position. e.g. people, places, bowling balls, as well as abstract areas
>> like cubes.” [W3C Basic Geo]
>> [2]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Jun/0116.html
>>
>>
>>
>>