- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:34:50 +0000
- To: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com>, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com>
- Cc: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfF9LziiCTL6JTnPsreoty-SHQEPRKjhnnZU3fc=_BJQE88Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Josh (in particular)... I have spent the day discussing requirements for describing data dimensions with Mark Hedly from the UK Met Office. My aim in the next week is to have a go at describing some common patterns - in particular how a dimension may support spatial, topological and feature-model related operations - such as traversing a nesting of catchments - or a nesting of irregular grids, or a codedDimension, or a time dimension. I am expecting this to need something like the spatial ontology - possibly GeoSPARQL will be adequate. Stay tuned for some straw man hacks to discuss.. Rob On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 at 01:42 Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@tumblingwalls.com> wrote: > It isn’t necessarily a problem that “something” is a feature and also > something else (a data tuple, an issue, etc.). The dissonance is when there > is real world and/or property overlap between two features. Integration > then needs to be guided by some expression of the actual overlap and > consideration of whether the two features in question actually share the > same metalevel (e.g. pile of material versus conjunction of hopes and > dreams). > > Josh > > > On Jun 22, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Jeremy Tandy <jeremy.tandy@gmail.com> wrote: > > Rob- following up discussion in the plenary call this week, the BP > Narrative is here: > > https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/BP_Narrative_2 > > You said that you'd try to identify implementation examples that fit in > the 9 scenarios we've identified. > > I also asked you to consider whether we should care about the fact that a > Feature (OGC / ISOTC211 parlance) can only be of one (and only one) Feature > Type (Class) where as in the web / linked data world a resource that is a > SpatialThing [1] may also be designated as other types of thing too ... > e.g. does this affect our ability to reconcile two Features that appear to > be talking about the same physical thing. This relates to the ISSUE 38 > questions being discussed in another WG email thread [2] > > Jeremy > > [1]: SpatialThing: “Anything with spatial extent, i.e. size, shape, or > position. e.g. people, places, bowling balls, as well as abstract areas > like cubes.” [W3C Basic Geo] > [2]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2016Jun/0116.html > > >
Received on Friday, 24 June 2016 16:35:35 UTC