W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > June 2016

RE: Merge requirements for non-geographic reference systems?

From: Little, Chris <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:45:07 +0000
To: Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3DAD8A5A545D7644A066C4F2E82072883E20326F@EXXCMPD1DAG4.cmpd1.metoffice.gov.uk>
Hi Frans,

Seems sensible to me. I cannot think of a reason to keep them separate.

Chris

From: Frans Knibbe [mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 11:39 AM
To: SDW WG Public List
Subject: Merge requirements for non-geographic reference systems?

Hello,

Going through open UCR issues, I noticed issue-32<https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/32>, which points out that two requirements are remarkably similar:
http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#IndependenceOnReferenceSystems and http://w3c.github.io/sdw/UseCases/SDWUseCasesAndRequirements.html#NonGeographicReferenceSystem


The first is a requirement for BP and SSN, the second for Coverages. Those different backgrounds may explain why the requirements are separate. But I see little reason to keep it that way. Does anyone object to merging the two requirements? That would result in one requirement with shared related deliverables and use cases.

Regards,
Frans

Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2016 16:45:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:31:22 UTC