- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:16:11 +0100
- To: Webmaster <webreq@w3.org>, SDW WG Public List <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>, Scott Simmons <ssimmons@opengeospatial.org>, Simon Cox <simon.cox@csiro.au>, "Little, Chris" <chris.little@metoffice.gov.uk>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
Hi Denis, This is a publication request for the 'FPWD' of the Time Ontology in OWL. I am confident that Ralph will approve the transition request [1] that contains a lot of the info you need. However, this is an unusual one for several reasons. Firstly, as you're used to by now, the copyright notice and logos are customised to account for this also being an OGC publication. Text used is exactly the same as /TR/vocab-ssn/ for example. What's doubly unusual is that this really is an FPWD - but one that has a previous version. This is because the previous version was published in 2006 by a different WG. We need to go through the FPWD process to trigger the IPR claims etc. I don't want to remove the previous version links (as PubRules screams at me to do of course) because that old link is still relevant. I see from https://www.w3.org/TR/tr-date-all#tr_2006 that the original one is retired - which is news to me. People have been using that spec since it was first published. Not sure why it's flagged as retired. It shouldn't be AFAIAC. The draft should appear at https://www.w3.org/TR/#tr_Data_on_the_Web PubRules also doesn't like DOIs. Several of the references have DOIs rather than proper URIs, which lead to redirects, but that's what DOIs are for. There is a reference, not a link, to http://www.daml.org/2003/02/fips55/id.owl#c049, that the namespace checker doesn't like as it doesn't dereference but it is correct. Hope this is all OK. Cheers Phil. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2016JulSep/0013.html -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 16:15:46 UTC